TransientTexan Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 13 minutes ago, NFLGURU said: Disagree. Aaron Rodgers playing is a business decision that would benefit the entire league. It's money, owners arent going to be pissed about that. Now if Goodell is trying to dictate terms of a Rodgers deal, yes that's out of bounds. Encouraging them to finish the deal one way or the other isn't IMO. Theres no punishment involved if they dont. This makes zero sense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 10 minutes ago, vegas492 said: Hey, maybe the NFL should step in and force GB to trade Rodgers to San Francisco. Get him into a bigger market that will draw more ratings and all owners will get a few more bucks in their pocket. Or...get Rodgers to New England, because everyone in the country wants to see BB now win one without Brady. Or....go with me on this....NFL puts a team overseas. Forces GB to send Rodgers there to fill those stands with fans so that every other owner can make more money. Vegas you better be careful continuing to pre-release the script 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green19 Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 That “wish list” looking more and more like a “list of demands” hahaha 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 (edited) Jets talking heads saying they need 1(13) for a tackle that Becton can’t be counted on , let’s add Nijman for Becton to the trade. 1(13), 2024 2nd, 2025 3rd if Rodgers plays in 2024., Moore, Ruckert, and Becton for ARod, Nijman and 2023 3rd. maybe settle for Mims or Davis in place of Moore, but if they sign OBJ they won’t need Moore. Edited March 17, 2023 by fattlipp 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, fattlipp said: Jets talking heads saying they need 1(13) for a tackle that Becton can’t be counted on , let’s add Nijman for Becton to the trade. Njiman needs to sign his tender before they can trade him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 7 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Njiman needs to sign his tender before they can trade him. When will that happen? Maybe the hold up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 I simply do not understand the impetus that the NFL would have to intervene in probably their biggest offseason story in order to bring it to a conclusion. Particularly when the holdup is very ordinary- two teams disagree on trade compensation. If Goodell was going to lean on someone, he wouldn't actually do anything before the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 1 minute ago, PossibleCabbage said: I simply do not understand the impetus that the NFL would have to intervene in probably their biggest offseason story...... They dont and wont. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 18 minutes ago, fattlipp said: Jets talking heads saying they need 1(13) for a tackle that Becton can’t be counted on , let’s add Nijman for Becton to the trade. 1(13), 2024 2nd, 2025 3rd if Rodgers plays in 2024., Moore, Ruckert, and Becton for ARod, Nijman and 2023 3rd. maybe settle for Mims or Davis in place of Moore, but if they sign OBJ they won’t need Moore. Becton really isn't a great fit for what we do. Nijman to them is a good idea though, frees up 4m. If they feel like Zach Tom is the future at RT. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 19 minutes ago, fattlipp said: Jets talking heads saying they need 1(13) for a tackle that Becton can’t be counted on , let’s add Nijman for Becton to the trade. 1(13), 2024 2nd, 2025 3rd if Rodgers plays in 2024., Moore, Ruckert, and Becton for ARod, Nijman and 2023 3rd. maybe settle for Mims or Davis in place of Moore, but if they sign OBJ they won’t need Moore. Why wouldn't the Jets just sign Nijman to an offer sheet if they really wanted him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLGURU Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 2 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: I simply do not understand the impetus that the NFL would have to intervene in probably their biggest offseason story in order to bring it to a conclusion. Particularly when the holdup is very ordinary- two teams disagree on trade compensation. If Goodell was going to lean on someone, he wouldn't actually do anything before the draft. Agree. Theres no hurry, let them fight it out for now and for the summer if it goes that long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Becton really isn't a great fit for what we do. Nijman to them is a good idea though, frees up 4m. If they feel like Zach Tom is the future at RT. For no particular reason Tom's always looked on the small side to hold down an OT position long term - but I just checked the roster and he fits right in with the rest of them.....on the smaller side....but not by much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, R T said: Why wouldn't the Jets just sign Nijman to an offer sheet if they really wanted him. Good. Wouldnt they owe a #2 in that case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddfather Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 1 minute ago, Leader said: Good. Wouldnt they owe a #2 in that case? Yes, I believe so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 38 minutes ago, Green19 said: That “wish list” looking more and more like a “list of demands” hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.