jrry32 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 3 minutes ago, squire12 said: Agreed, though that UGA defense was better than this Texas D While true, Ohio State's supporting cast was darn great. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thelonebillsfan Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 3 minutes ago, squire12 said: I feel like he is processing well this game. Again. I haven’t seen much extended games of him. This is the best game he's played from that perspective, but the majority of his looks don't look like today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Just now, jrry32 said: While true, Ohio State's supporting cast was darn great. Fair, Washington isn't lacking at WR either though. JSN sat out that game didnt he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich7sena Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 3 minutes ago, squire12 said: Is the age thing that big an issue? Option A. Younger but needs more time to develop. Option B. Older but more likely plug and play I think it matters because most NFL QBs don't meaningfully produce until year 2. And, I don't think the development timeline is that different with younger guys and older guys (i.e. coaches don't get a longer leash with young guys). For me, it matters when a player can produce early in his career because it feels like he's more of a "natural." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 2 minutes ago, 4thandInches said: Same, always thought it was kind of dumb logic. If I use say a top 15 pick and I get even just a decade of high end qb play, it’s easily worth it. Yep. And I gotta say, this feels like the QB class for the Rams to take a guy on late Day 1 or Day 2. We need to start planning for the post-Stafford era. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Just now, squire12 said: Fair, Washington isn't lacking at WR either though. JSN sat out that game didnt he? Yes. And Harrison got hurt in like the 3rd or 4th quarter. But I was more speaking of Ohio State's OL. Washington's is good, but it's not quite as good as OSU's was. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFan13 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 11 minutes ago, 4thandInches said: I wouldn’t be shocked if someone gets desperate and he goes top 10 -15ish I could legit see the Falcons taking a long look at him at 9 or so if we miss out on the top 3 guys. I just really worry about Kaleb mcgary sorry butt behind his blind side blocker lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 1 minute ago, Rich7sena said: I think it matters because most NFL QBs don't meaningfully produce until year 2. And, I don't think the development timeline is that different with younger guys and older guys (i.e. coaches don't get a longer leash with young guys). For me, it matters when a player can produce early in his career because it feels like he's more of a "natural." If development is 2 years for both a 21 year old as it is for a 24 year old, isnt it a wash in the 10-12 year career arc? Older can often mean more mentally mature and understanding of the professional aspects vs a younger prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFan13 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 13 minutes ago, jrry32 said: This is reminding me of C.J. Stroud's performance against UGA last year. That's what sold me on Stroud. Penix has been absolutely lights out. Same and i like Stroud before that game just like i liked Penix before this game. When you rise up and play your best game on your toughest competition that says alot to me for the next level. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronjon1990 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 5 minutes ago, General Tso said: Never thought age should be a weakness. In the best case scenario, you have him for 2 years less in a 15 year career. Like is that bad? lol The number of guys that start at QB consistently for 10 years is already low, especially for one team. I want 8-10 from a 1st round QB. Anything else is a bonus, imo. Penix isn't Brandon Weeden. He could easily start 8-10 for whoever takes him. He'll only be 24 this year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Sark is boozed up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malak1 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 On the sack it looked like Ewers hit is head on the ground. I wonder if that’s why Arch might’ve been warming up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronjon1990 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 4 minutes ago, jrry32 said: Yep. And I gotta say, this feels like the QB class for the Rams to take a guy on late Day 1 or Day 2. We need to start planning for the post-Stafford era. Leave Penix alone. I usually like you, but I don't want McVay and Penix terrorizing the league for the next decade. And they absolutely would. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Tso Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 1 minute ago, ronjon1990 said: The number of guys that start at QB consistently for 10 years is already low, especially for one team. I want 8-10 from a 1st round QB. Anything else is a bonus, imo. Penix isn't Brandon Weeden. He could easily start 8-10 for whoever takes him. He'll only be 24 this year. If you think about it, the most valuable years of a QB is the rookie contract. If a QB is more ready to win right now because they're older, that team has a 5 year window. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 1 minute ago, ronjon1990 said: The number of guys that start at QB consistently for 10 years is already low, especially for one team. I want 8-10 from a 1st round QB. Anything else is a bonus, imo. Penix isn't Brandon Weeden. He could easily start 8-10 for whoever takes him. He'll only be 24 this year. I think the medicals on his knee injuries/ surgeries will be more important than his age. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.