jrry32 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Just now, jrry32 said: I go for two here if I'm Texas. If they go for two and make it, it's a one-score game if Washington kicks a FG (37-29). If they don't get the 2PC, it's 34-27, still a one-TD game. Not the smartest move by Sarkisian. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miblue Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 3 hours ago, FalconFan13 said: Also i haven't seen or paid much attention to michigans DT Mason Graham. Is he always this disruptive and for his size he looks really fast. Yep, dude is a stud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Just now, Rich7sena said: I would be surprised if his knees are actually in bad shape since ACLs are like cakewalks now for orthopedic surgeons. And, he seems to move pretty well. I think NFL teams do care about age, though. The reason it gets brought up is because draft media talks about it and the only reason they talk about it is because scouts talk about and the only reason scouts talk about it is because their bosses talk about it. I think its talked about for most positions. Not sure as much with QB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyDez Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Is this the most WR talent on the same field since Bama/LSU from a few years ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronjon1990 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Rich7sena said: I would be surprised if his knees are actually in bad shape since ACLs are like cakewalks now for orthopedic surgeons. And, he seems to move pretty well. I think NFL teams do care about age, though. The reason it gets brought up is because draft media talks about it and the only reason they talk about it is because scouts talk about and the only reason scouts talk about it is because their bosses talk about it. You're acting like he's 27 years old. You just made the argument for development + 7 years. Penix would be 6 years from his physical peak of 30 and probably easier to mentally develop than some 20 yearbold with limited experience 2 years or so removed from their senior prom. Dude is going to be younger than Ryan Tannehill and a few months older than Carson Palmer, Eli Manning, and Joe Burrow were on Draft Day. Edited January 2 by ronjon1990 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 What a laser! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE DUKE Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Odunze is a stud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Huge drive by Washington Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thandInches Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Good lord Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 1 minute ago, jrry32 said: What a laser! Dropping it in the basket 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich7sena Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 1 minute ago, ronjon1990 said: You're acting like he's 27 years old. You just made the argument for development + 7 years. Penix would be 6 years from his physical peak of 30 and probably easier to mentally develop than some 20 yearbold with limited experience 2 years or so removed from their senior prom. All I'm saying is that his age will be a factor for NFL teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 (edited) 10 minutes ago, jrry32 said: If they go for two and make it, it's a one-score game if Washington kicks a FG (37-29). If they don't get the 2PC, it's 34-27, still a one-TD game. Not the smartest move by Sarkisian. If Washington settles for a FG, I will have been proven right. EDIT: And there it is. Washington is settling for a FG. Edited January 2 by jrry32 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronjon1990 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Just now, Rich7sena said: All I'm saying is that his age will be a factor for NFL teams. No more a factor than it was for Tannehill, Palmer, Manning, Burrow..... Meaning barely a factor at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Sark is such a duntz. He should've went for 2 on the last score, don't get it you're down 7, get it and you would've been down 5 with a chance to tie it if you could hold them to 3. Kicking the extra point legitimately did nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Just now, NYRaider said: Sark is such a duntz. He should've went for 2 on the last score, don't get it you're down 7, get it and you would've been down 5 with a chance to tie it if you could hold them to 3. Kicking the extra point legitimately did nothing. Somebody beat you to that punch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.