gopherwrestler Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 10 minutes ago, CriminalMind said: Whose on your OL "no list" (at #30)? Mine: Miller I’m amazed you have him this high. His tape is basically junk. Honestly TJ Clemmings project bad. He just tested through the roof. Before the combine I had him as a 3rd rounder just because I knew he would test well and was going to be athletic as a former TE. Still did way more than I expected... still not even close to a Rd 1 type guy for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 35 minutes ago, CriminalMind said: Whose on your OL "no list" (at #30)? Orlando Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopherwrestler Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Wow.... totally read that wrong.... “No List”..... oops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CriminalMind Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 My yes list for OL at 30 is: Wynn, Williams, McGlinchey, Daniels. Otherwise: BPA between DE & CB (Josh Jackson) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshpit23 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 I want Wynn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heavydan85 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 I want McGlinchey. I'd be very happy with Wynn,Hernandez, and Williams. I haven't watched Miller's tape...so as of now I'd understand it...from the sounds of it not if i saw his tape lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoDakViking Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 14 hours ago, CriminalMind said: Whose on your OL "no list" (at #30)? Mine: Price, Hernandez, Miller, Ragnow I'd be all for Hernandez at #30. Maybe on Price, no for Miller and Ragnow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perrynoid Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 12 hours ago, marshpit23 said: I want Wynn So, your motto is "Wynn to win"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikestyle Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 1 hour ago, NoDakViking said: I'd be all for Hernandez at #30. Maybe on Price, no for Miller and Ragnow I think I'd be fine with Ragnow at 30. Seems like a safe pick. It would remind me of the Travis Fredrick pick for the Cowboys years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kparty15 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Unless McGlinchhey or Williams are there at 30 I think we need to trade back. There is a surplus of OG’s that we could pick from in the 2nd round and then we could also add another pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CriminalMind Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 I'm not a fan of trading back & out of the 1st round... if an OL player I like is not available at #30 ... I'm selecting the BPA of the remaining players that could see +40% snaps this year (especially towards the end of the year) and could be a potential starter next year. I don't want to move out of the 1st round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kparty15 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 3 hours ago, CriminalMind said: I'm not a fan of trading back & out of the 1st round... if an OL player I like is not available at #30 ... I'm selecting the BPA of the remaining players that could see +40% snaps this year (especially towards the end of the year) and could be a potential starter next year. I don't want to move out of the 1st round. But what if an OL player that you like is still available, but will also still be available 5-10 picks later? I don’t understand your reasoning because it is very likely there will not be 1 single best player available at 30, but there may instead be a handful of players that are all very similarly talented. This draft is has a very deep pool of players that are late 1st to 2nd round talents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 If a player you like is available, you draft them. You can’t guarantee that the player you like will be there 5-10 picks later. You don’t take that chance. The Vikings tried to get cute in 2010, and they missed out on the guy many were linking to them in Patrick Robinson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solidvikingfan Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 1 hour ago, Kparty15 said: But what if an OL player that you like is still available, but will also still be available 5-10 picks later? I don’t understand your reasoning because it is very likely there will not be 1 single best player available at 30, but there may instead be a handful of players that are all very similarly talented. This draft is has a very deep pool of players that are late 1st to 2nd round talents. The main reasoning that can be brought up is Rick Spielman has shown to be a GM who likes to have the fifth year option to keep a player for that extra year and there has been no real proof that he would pass up on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kparty15 Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 23 minutes ago, SemperFeist said: If a player you like is available, you draft them. You can’t guarantee that the player you like will be there 5-10 picks later. You don’t take that chance. The Vikings tried to get cute in 2010, and they missed out on the guy many were linking to them in Patrick Robinson. Patrick Robinson hasn’t been anything special. I remember hearing that we were targeting Tebow that year. You’re right you can’t guarantee that the player you like will be there, but the point that I’m trying to make is that there might be multiple players that the team likes. There’s a possibility that the majority of Daniels, Wynn, Hernandez, Price, Ragnow, etc are all there at our pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.