CWood21 Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 2 hours ago, HorizontoZenith said: Better than nothing. Also, @Packerraymond, @CWood21, Arthur is openly trolling me and I won't stand by it. Make him fix it, fix it yourself or I'm going straight to the top until resigned is turned to re-signed. I thought it was well known that it was open trolling season on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBitzMan Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 House stinks and I hate this quid pro quo stuff. This better be a minimal deal where we can cut bait when he gets beat out by a draft pick/Pipkins or Rollins or Waters. All this does is give us flexibility during the draft. I wish they would've taken a shot on Breaux instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 Where does the quid pro quo enter into the signing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 Just now, TheBitzMan said: House stinks and I hate this quid pro quo stuff. This better be a minimal deal where we can cut bait when he gets beat out by a draft pick/Pipkins or Rollins or Waters. All this does is give us flexibility during the draft. I wish they would've taken a shot on Breaux instead. You realize that it could be worse, right? The Packers are better with House than they are without him. Remember who is telling you this. I am. I'm telling you this. What does that tell you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, TheBitzMan said: House stinks and I hate this quid pro quo stuff. This better be a minimal deal where we can cut bait when he gets beat out by a draft pick/Pipkins or Rollins or Waters. All this does is give us flexibility during the draft. I wish they would've taken a shot on Breaux instead. Doubt that happens, at worse case he'll be your 3rd or 4th guy on the depth chart which is pretty good for the kind of player he is. I'd still keep him if he gets beat out by the top 3 players we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 16 minutes ago, TheBitzMan said: House stinks and I hate this quid pro quo stuff. This better be a minimal deal where we can cut bait when he gets beat out by a draft pick/Pipkins or Rollins or Waters. All this does is give us flexibility during the draft. I wish they would've taken a shot on Breaux instead. First off, do you really believe that he's going to get much? We're more than a month out from the start of FA, and he's just now signing a 1 year deal with the team who signed him for 2016. I feel pretty damn confident that the Packers didn't invest much into him. Secondly, how does this prevent the Packers from signing Breaux if they wanted to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 I'd look to resign Brooks maybe, or maybe we should resign Goode. Really anyone Gute talks to about resigning who's willing to resign I think should resign. If they don't resign before the draft, look for them to resign after, that's usually the time that guys who still need to resign usually resign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 1 hour ago, pollino14 said: Very happy with this move. Great veteran experience and nice depth. Him , Tramon, King and a high draft pick will be a formidable group. With a better pass rush than last year, the unit as a whole should perform a lot better. King, Tramon and House as a trio is the worst in the NFC North and a bottom 10 group in the NFL. Maybe King changes that conversation if hes a shut down guy in year 2, but right now let's not pretend the offseason has been a success at CB. It hasnt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jleisher Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, packfanfb said: King, Tramon and House as a trio is the worst in the NFC North and a bottom 10 group in the NFL. Maybe King changes that conversation if hes a shut down guy in year 2, but right now let's not pretend the offseason has been a success at CB. It hasnt. I don't believe they are done at CB, they will draft one. Don't panic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 This offseason's CB FA signings would've sent this board into a spiralling meltdown the last few years. Glad to have house. Think he can still contribute but man this offseason has sucked at CB. Gute, buddy, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollino14 Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, packfanfb said: King, Tramon and House as a trio is the worst in the NFC North and a bottom 10 group in the NFL. Maybe King changes that conversation if hes a shut down guy in year 2, but right now let's not pretend the offseason has been a success at CB. It hasnt. On face value, yes. But if King makes that second year jump like we obviously expect then it’s a different story. And if we add an early round CB I’ll consider it a success. Veteran depth and a promising rookie not bad from where we’ve been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 16 minutes ago, pollino14 said: But if King makes that second year jump like we obviously expect then it’s a different story. I am hoping for a steady 2nd year from King. Just gets a bit tricky when the % of the jump happening probably falls around a 50/50 proposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollino14 Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, squire12 said: I am hoping for a steady 2nd year from King. Just gets a bit tricky when the % of the jump happening probably falls around a 50/50 proposition. For sure it’s not a given. I was pretty impressed with him last year, bum shoulder and all. I’m optimistic. Risk is there though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted April 12, 2018 Author Share Posted April 12, 2018 1 hour ago, TheBitzMan said: House stinks and I hate this quid pro quo stuff. This better be a minimal deal where we can cut bait when he gets beat out by a draft pick/Pipkins or Rollins or Waters. All this does is give us flexibility during the draft. I wish they would've taken a shot on Breaux instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilprin Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 50 minutes ago, jleisher said: I don't believe they are done at CB, they will draft one. Don't panic! Probably draft more than one...but the safety net is in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.