DaBoys Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 Trying to get a feel for his trade value, because the idea of paying DeMarcus Lawrence QB-money is still taking time to get comfortable with. Do you think a team would give up a 1st for him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBLIII Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 Yes. My team no though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 Is DLaw worth the 2nd overall pick? Yeah. If you use that second pick on Bosa, you're just hoping and praying he becomes as good as Dlaw, which is far from guaranteed. Would the 49ers trade that pick for Dlaw? I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVillain112 Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 Bengals would not. For one, Mike Brown isn't paying QB money to our QB, let alone a DE. Secondly, Bengals just extended Carlos Dunlap, and Geno Atkins. To add DLaw's contract, would allocate a significant amount of the team's cap space to the DL. Which means guys like AJ Green, and WJIII won't get re-signed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 I would as a Steelers fan. It wont happen because the Steelers would never trade a high pick for a veteran player, especially one that still needs a monster contract.....but we are desperate for a real pass rusher next to TJ Watt, and someone that can help us get after the QB without having to blitz constantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 I'd trade #27 sure. Downgrade from Mack to Lawrence, likely a little cheaper, but get an additional 1st, 3rd, etc would be worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 Eh. Clowney for Lawrence, straight up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBLIII Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 9 minutes ago, ET80 said: Eh. Clowney for Lawrence, straight up? wanna flip a coin?^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CP3MVP Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 A dominant pass rusher with our secondary good Lord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footbull3196 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 As a Vikings fan, for pick #18, without question I make that trade. Him and Hunter would be such a nice pair of edge rushers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 No. Because the Eagles can't afford him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsrule Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 57 minutes ago, footbull3196 said: As a Vikings fan, for pick #18, without question I make that trade. Him and Hunter would be such a nice pair of edge rushers Affording that will be a problem though. You'd have to cut Griffen, Sendejo, Remmers and Rudolph and hope you land some good OL in the draft. Forget about resigning Richardson or Barr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedTheClock Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Sure the Browns will give up #17 for him. Assuming it's not gone to an OBJ trade, which seems incredibly likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 I’d trade #24 in a heartbeat for Lawrence but #4? It’d be temptinf but probably not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Yeah, I think that's a good deal for the Titans first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.