Rainmaker90 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 15 hours ago, Golfman said: You're like Barack Obama, can't admit when you're wrong and like him, it happens a whole lot! You know what opinions and *******s have in common? The irony of you using Barack Obama for your analogy considering who his successor is 🤣🤣🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rainmaker90 said: The irony of you using Barack Obama for your analogy considering who his predecessor is 🤣🤣🤣 George Bush? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Y'all are trying to get this locked two days before the game smh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: George Bush? I could say that’s what I meant and still be right, but I will not. My mistake . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebpackfan Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Prediction: We lose because it’s our first game in a new offense and lots of new defenders, then this place collectively loses its **** because of whatever preconceived bias individuals happen to have is absolutely confirmed based on a play and a half in the game (Rodgers is done, No receivers after Adams, ILB is terrible, no pass rush, Crosby is the devil, la Fleur runs too much, etc). A less likely scenario is we catch the Bears off guard with new offense and win. And everyone is convinced we are Super Bowl bound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boratt Posted September 3, 2019 Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 Bears crushed the Rams outside zone/play action offense. Now, the Rams play mostly 11 personnel and were more easily coaxed out of zone run plays by the Bears, Lions and Patriots collective game plans of showing edge setting looks presnap. Lets see how the chess match evolves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Just now, Fl0nkerton said: Y'all are trying to get this locked two days before the game smh. Thanks, Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Let's get back on topic guys... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 hour ago, mikebpackfan said: Prediction: We lose because it’s our first game in a new offense and lots of new defenders, then this place collectively loses its **** because of whatever preconceived bias individuals happen to have is absolutely confirmed based on a play and a half in the game (Rodgers is done, No receivers after Adams, ILB is terrible, no pass rush, Crosby is the devil, la Fleur runs too much, etc). A less likely scenario is we catch the Bears off guard with new offense and win. And everyone is convinced we are Super Bowl bound. This is why I love Week 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 worst Game Day Thread ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Catching up.... Bears kicked the can down the road concerning Mack and his deal. Which is smart. They have cap space today, not a ton next year, but that is why you roll from this year. It's about as good of a scenario as you can have, providing your young QB is good enough to get it done. And I have my reservations concerning Trubisky. Here's what I'm anxious to see on Thursday... 1) True unveiling of the MLF offensive scheme. We've been told he's gonna run more. Let's see if it is true. 2) Smith's on the Edge. Man, excited to see what each can do! 3) Back end safety play with Amos and Savage. We've heard that it looked good in practice...let's see it for realsies now. 4) MVS. Second year ascending player with size and speed? Yes please! Just like cowbell, I'm gonna need more MVS. 5) O-line. They've all started many games. Improved greatly at RG and depth. Could be a top 10 or top 5 line in the league. 6) X Factor...what is it gonna be? Or who is it gonna be? Gary? Trevor Davis? Kumerow? As this team was going through the off-season, I didn't have my usual enthusiasm for the team. Was more practical and perhaps analytical. But now that it is time to play? I'm getting that fun feeling again. That true fan feeling! And I'm digging it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boratt Posted September 3, 2019 Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 I’m concerned about how AR fits into this offense. AR has run an audible/adjustment offense Defenses show run defense presnap AR predictably switches to pass play AR falls into defenses trap AR was in gun so he holds the ball and gets away Receivers adjust to post snap defense Sacks or big plays happen Why that will not work in the shannahan offense: Rodgers predictably changes to pass plays Defense trap works now Rodgers is under center with play action Rodgers can’t get away like he could from gun Rodgers dead These are two philosophies that don’t mix well. McVay runs an audible adjustment shannahan offense and good defenses trapped him into bad play calls and destroyed his offense. I worry AR is gonna push hard for this type of audible offense and get destroyed against good defenses who trap him In play action the same way the Rams were trapped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSG Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 hours ago, Arthur Penske said: The "McVay style offense" term relating to GB and the notion that MLF got his job because of McVay (by some) really needs to go. He's been more Shanahan influenced. Obviously MLF is calling the shots, but Let's also not forget that Hackett sure isn't a McVay guy. There's going to be differences between what LA runs and what GB does and MLF/Rodgers have said as much multiple times. They also had Goff as QB. I think that may be Rodgers is a bit better? Callahan dosen't play for the Bears anymore, they replaced him with Skrine. Why does it need to go? He ran a dumpster for an offense in the only instance he got control away from Mcvay. Had he not been associated with Mcvay there is a 0% chance he's our head coach right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 I can guarantee you the Packers will look better than you all do in this GDT. Talk about dumpster fires.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, SSG said: Why does it need to go? He ran a dumpster for an offense in the only instance he got control away from Mcvay. Had he not been associated with Mcvay there is a 0% chance he's our head coach right now. Probably, but the ties to Mike and Kyle Shanahan didn't hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.