Jump to content

Day 3 of 2020 Draft (New thread because Heinz D wanted one)


CBears019

Recommended Posts

Just now, dll2000 said:

I like Ifedi at G or T.  

I just feel like he is on a one year deal and you need to constantly replenish O line with new talent or you will have to go to FA and pay through the nose to fix a hole.  

 

As a guy.  Obviously Seattle couldn’t wait to see him go so don’t expect pro bowls.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Heinz D. said:

The O Line needs more talented guys. Leno and Massie are a problem. They'd been, traditionally, about average, but Massie wavered up and down, and Leno played, for the most part, like absolute crap. 

That's a REALLY big problem. Do you not see that as an issue?

 

They were both fine 2 years ago. But yes, I realize it's a problem. However, I also realize that we have other issues that need to be addressed too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WindyCity said:

If they draft a P instead of an OLmen I will burn this board to the ground.

A punter in round 7 has a much higher chance of being an improvement than the 60th OL. Any OL we take at this point isn’t going to be any more talented than an UDFA. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AZBearsFan said:

A punter in round 7 has a much higher chance of being an improvement than the 60th OL. Any OL we take at this point isn’t going to be any more talented than an UDFA. 

This I don't disagree with. At this stage, draft whoever. I wanted OL in round 5 or even a trade up into the 4th. It's over with now

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JustAnotherFan said:

They were both fine 2 years ago. But yes, I realize it's a problem. However, I also realize that we have other issues that need to be addressed too.

What are more glaring issues than that? By concentrating fully on a single cornerback spot, Pace has completely screwed up any number of other positions on the team. 

I guess we'll have to disagree on this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JustAnotherFan said:

They were both fine 2 years ago. But yes, I realize it's a problem. However, I also realize that we have other issues that need to be addressed too.

CB was over addressed.

OL should not be a position that you do not address.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AZBearsFan said:

A punter in round 7 has a much higher chance of being an improvement than the 60th OL. Any OL we take at this point isn’t going to be any more talented than an UDFA. 

You can say the same thing about Punters.

By taking the OLmen now you guarantee you get them instead of bidding on them and possibly losing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...