Packerraymond Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 Allen Lazard is the Packers #3. Funchess would've been our #4 last year or this year. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammymvpknight Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 I like Benjamin. Looks like he’s in better shape than when he left. I think he has a chance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: Not on here lol Find me a source that thought it was a good move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 3 hours ago, incognito_man said: You guys are clueless I think the general consensus is you're out of your mind. It's pretty much you vs the entire board on this one, but WE'RE wrong. Yeah, totes makes sense. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Packerraymond said: Allen Lazard is the Packers #3. Funchess would've been our #4 last year or this year. Don't tell Capt Devin over there, he was the odds on favorite to be the #2... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Packerraymond said: Allen Lazard is the Packers #3. Funchess would've been our #4 last year or this year. Yep. 100% agreed. Not sure why people who have no clue disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Yep. 100% agreed. Not sure why people who have no clue disagree. ... On 5/14/2021 at 11:14 AM, incognito_man said: (3) A former #1 WR who continually improved in a pass-scarce offense on his rookie contract, was then signed to a $10mil/year contract but broke his collarbone. So yes, adding someone with Funchess' skillset improves the team. He would have been the leading candidate as the #2 WR in GB. The joking about Funchess signing just shows a significant lack of understanding about who he is and what the actual role/production of a #2 WR is. "Average" #2 WRs in 2020 had a statline that looks like this: 56 rec, 739 yds, 4 TDs. Funchess would absolutely have been right in that range had he played and stayed healthy IMO. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 34 minutes ago, ET80 said: ... Haha, ET bringing up old stuff. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 19 pages of Megatron vs Edelman, 38 for Tebow, and now 20 about Devin Funchess. Preseason can't get here soon enough. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 2 hours ago, ET80 said: ... eek You know your argument has lost all coherency when your big "gotcha" is pointing out the difference between two brilliant GB posters is this: @Packerraymond thinks Allen Lazard would have won the battle for the #2 WR over Funchess I am not so confident Lazard would have won that battle. Good chance he would have, but not my leading candidate at that time. Whoaaaaa Nellie! Stop the presses lmao What a reveal! You literally have no point anymore. In fact, there really wasn't one to start with... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 On 3/14/2021 at 3:36 PM, MrOaktown_56 said: But why when you spent a 2nd rounder on a back. Could have just taken a WR when it was sorely needed. On 3/14/2021 at 3:39 PM, Malfatron said: They had Funchess but he opted out On 3/14/2021 at 3:40 PM, Forge said: I do not think this statement has the impact that you expected it to. On 3/14/2021 at 3:44 PM, Malfatron said: How about if i go to the highlight reel 4 hours ago, ET80 said: Find me a source that thought it was a good move. QED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 (edited) 58 minutes ago, incognito_man said: @Packerraymond thinks Allen Lazard would have won the battle for the #2 WR over Funchess I am not so confident Lazard would have won that battle. FWIW, as a fan with no allegiance to either side, for or against, I can't say I disagree with him. I think Lazard has untapped potential whereas I feel like Funchess has reached his peak and his ceiling isn't nearly as high at this point. I've talked about Lazard on here too. Just to note as a reference. Edited May 16, 2021 by JAF-N72EX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 7 hours ago, JAF-N72EX said: FWIW, as a fan with no allegiance to either side, for or against, I can't say I disagree with him. I think Lazard has untapped potential whereas I feel like Funchess has reached his peak and his ceiling isn't nearly as high at this point. I've talked about Lazard on here too. Just to note as a reference. I agree now for sure. Lazard is ahead of Funchess for 2021 comfortably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 Well, I never thought I’d see a Allen Lazard or Devin Funchess debate . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 8 hours ago, incognito_man said: eek You know your argument has lost all coherency when your big "gotcha" is pointing out the difference between two brilliant GB posters is this: @Packerraymond thinks Allen Lazard would have won the battle for the #2 WR over Funchess I am not so confident Lazard would have won that battle. Good chance he would have, but not my leading candidate at that time. Whoaaaaa Nellie! Stop the presses lmao What a reveal! You literally have no point anymore. In fact, there really wasn't one to start with... You literally said you 100% agree that Funchess would have been the #4 last year, despite saying that he was the front runner for the #2 just the day prior, and that the stats conclusively show he was good enough to be the #2. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts