Jump to content

Week 10 College Football Thread: WE'VE GOT MACTION (oh and #1 and #2 play)


MikeT14

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, MWil23 said:

Do we really believe Tennessee will be left out? They’re your fourth team if they win out. 

Georgia

OSU/UM

TCU

Tennessee

USC has not beaten anyone this year. Yes they have a dramatic close loss. They do play UCLA/Notre Dame yet. 

Oregon got absolutely housed and the CFP has held that against teams in the past.

To be honest, the CFP should even take the loser of the OSU/UM game as the fourth team when TCU loses, but they won’t.

Oregon has greatly improved since that first game though. Tennessee won't even play in their conference championship game so that will weigh extremely heavily on the committee and probably more than a week 1 loss when the (potential) PAC12 champions are playing lights out football. 

Just my opinion but one thing is certain and that's this year will have some people upset as they will feel left out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mse326 said:

I feel like we (as in college football fans) have this argument every year about whether conference championships matter. I am of the opinion they shouldn't. It should be the best 4 teams. And there has never been a true test, but they have shown where confrence championships isn't that highly regarded. OSU and Penn St. Penn St had one more loss but has the conference championship and H2H, they still went with OSU.

Can you tell me that a one-loss Ohio State/Michigan is decisively better than a one-loss USC/UCLA/Oregon/TCU team?  I'm not sure I would.  Both Ohio State and Michigan both have Penn State as their best win, and Ohio State's next best win is probably Notre Dame.  And they won't get a buff because the Big 10 West is weak with a likely championship win over Illinois, Purdue, Wisconsin, or Iowa.  Last year, when the SEC got two teams in Alabama beat Georgia in the regular season, but Georgia beat Alabama in the SEC Championship. 2017 is the only time a team made the playoffs without playing in their Conference Championship and there wasn't another one-loss team that was a Conference Champion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BobbyPhil1781 said:

He's a really good coach. Before we got Knowles, I was hoping we'd pursue him. 

The older I get, the more I think being a HC is about being a good leader and people manager instead of being the best pure coach in the room. If you're a good boss, good coaches will want to work for you and players will want to play for you.

Leonhard's looked comfortable so far, which says a lot considering he's been pretty public that it's his dream job and he had zero notice. The players loved Chryst and the only issue was Logan Brown, which was handled with zero fuss. That also says a lot. He'll get good HC job offers if we don't make him permanent based on how he's done in my opinion.

Edited by ramssuperbowl99
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CWood21 said:

Can you tell me that a one-loss Ohio State/Michigan is decisively better than a one-loss USC/UCLA/Oregon/TCU team?  I'm not sure I would.  Both Ohio State and Michigan both have Penn State as their best win, and Ohio State's next best win is probably Notre Dame.  And they won't get a buff because the Big 10 West is weak with a likely championship win over Illinois, Purdue, Wisconsin, or Iowa.  Last year, when the SEC got two teams in Alabama beat Georgia in the regular season, but Georgia beat Alabama in the SEC Championship. 2017 is the only time a team made the playoffs without playing in their Conference Championship and there wasn't another one-loss team that was a Conference Champion. 

We have never seen conference championship make a difference. And they say they goal is to get the best 4 teams which means that whatever lip service they may pay to conference championships, there is no logical reason that that should influence the ultimate goal when comparing teams in different conferences

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mse326 said:

We have never seen conference championship make a difference. And they say they goal is to get the best 4 teams which means that whatever lip service they may pay to conference championships, there is no logical reason that that should influence the ultimate goal when comparing teams in different conferences

In the 8 playoffs we've had so far, we've only had 2 P5 conference non-champions make the playoffs: 2017 (Alabama) and 2022 (Georgia).  George was clearly a top 4 team the entire 2022 season, so leaving them out of the playoffs was clearly a non-starter.  In 2017, Alabama made the playoffs as an 11-1 team while the Big 10 and Pac-12 had two-loss conference champions (USC and Ohio State).  Personally, I don't think Michigan has played like a clear top 4 team all year.  I think you could argue that Ohio State has, so it'd depend on who their loss was against and how bad it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in the end we aren’t going to sweat anybody that gets left out. Individual fan bases will, but in the grand scheme of things, I think there are going to be two or three teams that are legitimate title contenders. If you can’t beat your rival in the Ohio State/Michigan game, tough luck, you knew I was at stake. I’m not saying the loser of that game might not still be a top four team, but I don’t think it would change the eventual outcome as far as a champ, and that game should be played as a playoff mindset anyhow. I’d say the same thing about some of those other late season games that happen in other conferences. Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if Oregon, TCU, and USC all lose  a game yet. Clemson has the easiest path of the bubble teams imo. But I’m not sure how the committee would view them. Like they won’t have beaten anybody good.

Just a guess and projection but I see UGA, UM/OSU winner, Tennessee, and either Oregon or Clemson. A lot can happen in a week though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NateDawg said:

Just a guess and projection but I see UGA, UM/OSU winner, Tennessee, and either Oregon or Clemson. A lot can happen in a week though. 

As long as TCU wins out, they're in.  They're not leaving out an undefeated P5 champ.  If they lose, it opens up the door.  Clemson could end up backdooring it despite the fact that they've slept walked through the season so far.  A one-loss Pac-12 champ probably makes it into the playoffs as well, especially since they will likely get a late season statement win (either USC/UCLA over Oregon OR Oregon over USC/UCLA).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CWood21 said:

As long as TCU wins out, they're in.  They're not leaving out an undefeated P5 champ.  If they lose, it opens up the door.  Clemson could end up backdooring it despite the fact that they've slept walked through the season so far.  A one-loss Pac-12 champ probably makes it into the playoffs as well, especially since they will likely get a late season statement win (either USC/UCLA over Oregon OR Oregon over USC/UCLA).

Yeah they would definitely make it if they win out. I think they lose though, at least once. So it’s my best guess projecting forward.

Edited by NateDawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If USC wins out, they're getting in. They'd be 12-1 with late season wins over UCLA, Notre Dame and either Utah or Oregon three straight weeks.

Oregon probably gets in as well considering they'd have beaten Utah and USC/UCLA over the last 3 weeks of the season. They actually finish with a strong schedule considering Washington is likely going to be ranked this week. Just depends on how they view that opening week loss but, again, teams aren't the same in November as they were in early September.

Edited by beekay414
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BobbyPhil1781 said:

Oregon has greatly improved since that first game though. Tennessee won't even play in their conference championship game so that will weigh extremely heavily on the committee and probably more than a week 1 loss when the (potential) PAC12 champions are playing lights out football. 

Just my opinion but one thing is certain and that's this year will have some people upset as they will feel left out

Has Oregon greatly improved, or are they just playing in a weak conference?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BobbyPhil1781 said:

It's a valid question. While I admit I haven't then extremely closely, I'd be willing to bet it's a combination of both. Which is more apparent though? Not sure but I'd lean with the former

Assuming Tennessee wins out, I couldn't pick Oregon over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...