Jump to content

GDT Raiders (3-3) at Bears (1-5): Lets stack these dubs


NYRaider

Who wins  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Winner

    • Raiders
      13
    • Bears
      5


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RaidersAreOne said:

I think AOC starts and makes it difficult for us to pivot back to Jimmy. I want to see a freaking deep ball to Tucker in the worst way. Tre is usually open deep and I remember him and AOC having some chemistry in PS.

Make it happen.

I want to see Adams catch 20 balls and 300 yards.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Geezy said:

Irks me that’s he’s complaining after two wins, yet says nothing after losses and he stacks numbers. 

He knows this isn't sustainable, nor is it at any level competitive with playoff teams. He's been to the post season 6 times, he knows what it takes to get there and is stating that we're not there yet. I don't think there's anything to that other than how simple it appears.  He's saying "Great, we won, but this isn't anything to be proud of, and we won't keep winning like this."  You can't win if you sideline your own star players. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NickButera said:

He knows this isn't sustainable, nor is it at any level competitive with playoff teams. He's been to the post season 6 times, he knows what it takes to get there and is stating that we're not there yet. I don't think there's anything to that other than how simple it appears.  He's saying "Great, we won, but this isn't anything to be proud of, and we won't keep winning like this."  You can't win if you sideline your own star players. 

He knows what we all know. 

And yeah, it's not sustainable. We've played some of the league's worst and we're only barely better than any of them. Possibly worse, all told. 

If we played Denver, Pittsburgh, New England 6 times per year and beat Arizona, Chicago, Carolina, and Tennessee, there's a 10 win season. But what would it really say? Best of the worst? And that's the big issue we're in. We might not be as bad as Chicago or New England, but we're not a whole lot better. But winning just diminishes our ability to improve and get better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Geezy said:

i hate that youre right, and theres better than a slight possibility it happens lol 

Yea the old Raiders have done that for 30 years. Random players got contracts breaking out vs Raiders.
 

Nick Mullins still getting deals from that TNF game on SF years ago lol

Doug Martin got a deal from us after his career game 

However, this hasn’t seem liked our traditional defense so we will see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...