wgbeethree Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, MaryTsraining3s said: Just saw on one of the sports betting sites that Rodgers line to start is +280. To what extent does that worry everybody? Say this almost every time someone brings up betting. The odds have way more to do with how they think people will bet than how they think things will actually happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 3 minutes ago, MaryTsraining3s said: Just saw on one of the sports betting sites that Rodgers line to start is +280. To what extent does that worry everybody? Normally, something like that might concern me, but I believe this is truly a case where no one outside of 1265 Lombardi Ave. knows what is going on. I think they have successfully kept this one air-tight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 10 minutes ago, wgbeethree said: The odds have way more to do with how they think people will bet than how they think things will actually happen. At one point - the Packers were the odds on favorite to land Khalil Mack. That was mostly due to the 100 page thread in this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted September 14, 2018 Author Share Posted September 14, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaryTsraining3s Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 17 minutes ago, Shanedorf said: At one point - the Packers were the odds on favorite to land Khalil Mack. That was mostly due to the 100 page thread in this forum. That wasn't quite as black and white as this one, with a few other factors/options playing into that equation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 36 minutes ago, MaryTsraining3s said: Just saw on one of the sports betting sites that Rodgers line to start is +280. To what extent does that worry everybody? It worries me zero because 'one of the sports betting sites' doesn't mean anything to me Hopefully no one is worried by this vague info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 41 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Personally I think both Thielan and Diggs are too twitchy for King. I'd rather see him on a guy like Treadwell and have Williams, Jackson, Alexander covering T and D. doesn't king have ELITE CoD numbers? Or am I misremembering? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaryTsraining3s Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 9 minutes ago, incognito_man said: It worries me zero because 'one of the sports betting sites' doesn't mean anything to me Hopefully no one is worried by this vague info If I named a specific site, would that get you thinking a little more? What if it does worry somebody, would you start bullying them? Should I start referring to you as Richie Incognito_man? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, incognito_man said: doesn't king have ELITE CoD numbers? Or am I misremembering? Not sure. I know he's a good athlete overall, but I feel we haven't seen the same play-speed on the field yet. Still not my top choice to man-up on guys like Thielan or Diggs. I'd let Alexander stay on Thielan's hip all game and use a combo of Williams/Jackson/King on Diggs depending on where he lines up on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 3 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Not sure. I know he's a good athlete overall, but I feel we haven't seen the same play-speed on the field yet. Still not my top choice to man-up on guys like Thielan or Diggs. I'd let Alexander stay on Thielan's hip all game and use a combo of Williams/Jackson/King on Diggs depending on where he lines up on the field. King is superior athletically in every field. You're over thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Just now, Packerraymond said: King is superior athletically in every field. You're over thinking. ^ Plus, if there's a concern about play speed, Jackson and Williams have less make up speed than King does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollino14 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: Personally I think both Thielan and Diggs are too twitchy for King. I'd rather see him on a guy like Treadwell and have Williams, Jackson, Alexander covering T and D. King has to cover one of the two. No question about it. And Idt King has trouble with twitcher guys, just because he has the length to matchup vs the bigger guys doesn’t mean he doesn’t have the footwork to the twitcher guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 21 minutes ago, MaryTsraining3s said: If I named a specific site, would that get you thinking a little more? What if it does worry somebody, would you start bullying them? Should I start referring to you as Richie Incognito_man? I agree with @wgbeethree anyway so it really wouldn't make me worry either way. However if it were on a reputable book, I'd pay maybe a little more attention to it. And I'd probably just restate wg's line to anyone who was worried. Is having that opinion considered bullying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaryTsraining3s Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: I agree with @wgbeethree anyway so it really wouldn't make me worry either way. However if it were on a reputable book, I'd pay maybe a little more attention to it. And I'd probably just restate wg's line to anyone who was worried. Is having that opinion considered bullying? Sorry, I should have put a couple to display my humor. No need to be all up in arms when the "bullying" term is thrown around. Probably shouldn't be something to joke about on my end. Regardless, I see there is a dedicated thread to Rodgers' knee so I apologize for bringing that nonsense to this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar Danneskjold Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 30 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Not sure. I know he's a good athlete overall, but I feel we haven't seen the same play-speed on the field yet. Still not my top choice to man-up on guys like Thielan or Diggs. I'd let Alexander stay on Thielan's hip all game and use a combo of Williams/Jackson/King on Diggs depending on where he lines up on the field. Never mind- you may be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.