Jump to content

Raiders Defense


Rolni

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Jerry said:

I dont think there is a top 15 FS, but the group of them are all pretty stellar.  I think 2-3 really solid FSs this draft.

that's why I'd rather fix it with proven talent in FA. tired of having meh safeties

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, big_palooka said:

According to Vic Tafur, Littleton was a bit of an afterthought when they missed on Byron Jones:

I read someplace else I can't find, that when they spoke to Guenther about Littleton, his response was luke warm as if he wasn't overly excited about the player. Seems it was a bad fit for his scheme from the jump.

Long term I'd rather pay littleton 12 mil than Jones 16-17. Guenther put him in poor positions to make plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ronjon1990 said:

Long term I'd rather pay Littleton 16-17 mil than ever hear the words "Guenther" and "scheme fit" in the same sentence ever again.

If we could just stop talking about Guenther, that would be great.  He's up there with J. Russell and Rolando McClain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, big_palooka said:

Hating on Guenther is so much easier than admitting the Raiders suck at drafting defense.

I don't know man, Guenther had 3 years to make things better, and they just got worse.  I don't know how you can't blame a coordinator when he can't even move us from 30th to at least around the 25 range.  There was just no improvement made at all.  None.  Mullen regressed, Kwit played okay, Littleton is now being talked about as a garbage can after he was literally an All Pro/Pro Bowl caliber LB for the Rams.  M. Collins got thrown around like a rag doll.  We couldn't set the edges to save our lives on the DL.  I mean it was just so ugly watching our defense play.  I'm good man, Guenther sucks. I truly believe that.  I think the Vikings HC is just giving him the "ol' buddy" hookup.  If he didn't go there, he'd probably still be jobless.

Edited by Jerry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Jerry said:

I don't know man, Guenther had 3 years to make things better, and they just got worse.  I don't know how you can't blame a coordinator when he can't even move us from 30th to at least around the 25 range.  There was just no improvement made at all.  None.  Mullen regressed, Kwit played okay, Littleton is now being talked about as a garbage can after he was literally an All Pro/Pro Bowl caliber LB for the Rams.  M. Collins got thrown around like a rag doll.  We couldn't set the edges to save our lives on the DL.  I mean it was just so ugly watching our defense play.  I'm good man, Guenther sucks. I truly believe that.  I think the Vikings HC is just giving him the "ol' buddy" hookup.  If he didn't go there, he'd probably still be jobless.

Guenther's 4 years with the Bengals ranked his defense ranked 12, 2, 8, 16 in scoring. He had talent on every level of his defense. 

3 years with the Raiders. They traded their franchise player on defense. He had constant turnover on all units. A lot of young, inexperienced players. Rookies expected to fill major roles. Or worse, vets with nothing left.  

It was a complete disaster in draft and talent acquisitions on defense. He manned a defense on a team that spent all their money on their coaches offense. 

Guenther was a highly regarded defensive coach when he was hired. Yes, he deserves some of the blame... but the talent he was afforded was laughably terrible. No coach would have found success in his situation. 

Hating on him is a scapegoat for the real problems that plague this team. They SUCK in the draft and have for decades. Name a defensive player drafted worth a damn in 20 years not named Mack or Asomugha?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, big_palooka said:

Guenther's 4 years with the Bengals ranked his defense ranked 12, 2, 8, 16 in scoring. He had talent on every level of his defense. 

3 years with the Raiders. They traded their franchise player on defense. He had constant turnover on all units. A lot of young, inexperienced players. Rookies expected to fill major roles. Or worse, vets with nothing left.  

It was a complete disaster in draft and talent acquisitions on defense. He manned a defense on a team that spent all their money on their coaches offense. 

Guenther was a highly regarded defensive coach when he was hired. Yes, he deserves some of the blame... but the talent he was afforded was laughably terrible. No coach would have found success in his situation. 

Hating on him is a scapegoat for the real problems that plague this team. They SUCK in the draft and have for decades. Name a defensive player drafted worth a damn in 20 years not named Mack or Asomugha?

I like how you took the 2 best players out lol...But hey, can't blame Gruden for 20 years of mediocrity.  Can't blame Mayock either.  You can only blame them for 2-3 years of average drafting.  Not stellar, not terrible, but average IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, big_palooka said:

Guenther's 4 years with the Bengals ranked his defense ranked 12, 2, 8, 16 in scoring. He had talent on every level of his defense. 

3 years with the Raiders. They traded their franchise player on defense. He had constant turnover on all units. A lot of young, inexperienced players. Rookies expected to fill major roles. Or worse, vets with nothing left.  

It was a complete disaster in draft and talent acquisitions on defense. He manned a defense on a team that spent all their money on their coaches offense. 

Guenther was a highly regarded defensive coach when he was hired. Yes, he deserves some of the blame... but the talent he was afforded was laughably terrible. No coach would have found success in his situation. 

Hating on him is a scapegoat for the real problems that plague this team. They SUCK in the draft and have for decades. Name a defensive player drafted worth a damn in 20 years not named Mack or Asomugha?

Guenther had a ready made defense handed to him and when he came to the Raiders he showed he could not build a defense or teach the players.  Gruden said he could teach coaches but he lacked the ability to teach players.  The guy could be a football genius but being the smartest does not always make you the best.  When he took over in Cinci they had a bunch of vets in their prime that knew what they were suppose to do.  I am not saying he can not come up with a good game plan but he has struggled to translate what ever talents he has to production on the field.  You can say he had no talent but some players looked better after he left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jerry said:

I like how you took the 2 best players out lol...But hey, can't blame Gruden for 20 years of mediocrity.  Can't blame Mayock either.  You can only blame them for 2-3 years of average drafting.  Not stellar, not terrible, but average IMO.

What 2 best players were taken out?

Average? Look at the defensive players drafted in the first 3 rounds under Gruden - PJ Hall, Key, Ferrell, Abram, Mullen, Arnette, Muse. This group has had zero impact and most look like one and done contract guys. 

This is in fact terrible and the reason this team is failing Gruden the GM botched every pick made defensively thus far including the #4 overall selection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, drfrey13 said:

Guenther had a ready made defense handed to him and when he came to the Raiders he showed he could not build a defense or teach the players.  Gruden said he could teach coaches but he lacked the ability to teach players.  The guy could be a football genius but being the smartest does not always make you the best.  When he took over in Cinci they had a bunch of vets in their prime that knew what they were suppose to do.  I am not saying he can not come up with a good game plan but he has struggled to translate what ever talents he has to production on the field.  You can say he had no talent but some players looked better after he left.

Kind of my point. You have to have talent. No coach could have done anything with what is an absolutely terrible group of defensive talent. 

A good coach can elevate a B+ player to an A player. But you can't elevate a bunch of D and C players into B players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, big_palooka said:

What 2 best players were taken out?

Average? Look at the defensive players drafted in the first 3 rounds under Gruden - PJ Hall, Key, Ferrell, Abram, Mullen, Arnette, Muse. This group has had zero impact and most look like one and done contract guys. 

This is in fact terrible and the reason this team is failing Gruden the GM botched every pick made defensively thus far including the #4 overall selection. 

Asomugha and Mack.  Anyway.  You're looking at the defense only.  And Crosby in the 4th is a steal whether anyone agrees or not.  17 sacks lead his class from what I can recall.  Then Moreau, Renfrow, Jacobs, K. Miller, T. Mullen was a good pick IMO.  I think they're pretty decent drafts.  Didn't get the production we wanted from our last draft class but it was only year one.  Again, you're already counting out this last draft class and the class before it for the most part.  I still intend to give them time to develop.  Especially the players on defense.  If they are still scrubs this upcoming season and next or Bradley benches all of them, then I'll agree with you.  But I'd rather play the waiting game then just crap on them and throw them in the trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...