SirA1 Posted July 30, 2019 Author Share Posted July 30, 2019 Voting technically doesn't open until 2pm each day and I'm not home until aroud 4pm anyways. I'm also going to combine it with Topic 4 since they are both a similar removal of older confusing language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 16 hours ago, Jlash said: The Pheltz rule penalized you for not 3 upping the player immediately in-season, and made you back pay a contract essentially if you waited until after the season. Like SirA said before, eliminating in season 3 ups sort of eliminates the Pheltz rule, but we should put it in writing. You still get penalized if it is a FA even if they are in their 5th year of their contract, they get backdated all five years and you have to average that out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheltzbahr Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 45 minutes ago, PR said: You still get penalized if it is a FA even if they are in their 5th year of their contract, they get backdated all five years and you have to average that out. Not sure what this means. Can you give a theoretical or actual example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 (edited) 37 minutes ago, pheltzbahr said: Not sure what this means. Can you give a theoretical or actual example. In FA he wanted to sign a guy who had a year(s?) left on a deal that was for less than what the average of the contract was. He wasn't happy about it because he wanted to pay less than the average of the contract. Edited July 30, 2019 by Jlash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 Not voting on two til one is taken care of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheltzbahr Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 20 minutes ago, Jlash said: In FA he wanted to sign a guy who had a year(s?) left on a deal that was for less than what the average of the contract was. He wasn't happy about it because he wanted to pay less than the average of the contract. Oh, so nothing to do with 3 Ups, got it. Thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted July 30, 2019 Author Share Posted July 30, 2019 (edited) On 7/29/2019 at 3:43 PM, SirA1 said: Topic 1 Vote Count - Return 3 Ups to the off season. Yes (7) - Whicker, JLash, Bcb1213, Hockey, RuskieTitan, SirA1, wwhickock No (3) - Pheltz, MD4L, XMad Abstain (1) - PR Still need official votes from the following on Topic 1. @BringinDaPain @WFLukic @Ragnarok @Counselor @TedLavie Edited July 30, 2019 by SirA1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 1 hour ago, SirA1 said: Still need official votes from the following on Topic 1. @BringinDaPain @MD4L @WFLukic @Ragnarok @PR @Counselor @SwoleXmad @TedLavie Abstain. I didn't have anyone to 3UP this past offseason so was planning on 3Uping during season, so this vote goes against the planning I had in place so I would show bias in my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 no Also can we just get rid of the pheltz rule, it makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 I'll read through anything I need to tomorrow night. Day 1 of bar is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted July 30, 2019 Author Share Posted July 30, 2019 6 hours ago, bcb1213 said: Not voting on two til one is taken care of Noted but it looks like we are stalled out on Topic 1 until tomorrow at least. I'm going to open voting since it looks like there will be nothing else to do until then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted July 30, 2019 Author Share Posted July 30, 2019 (edited) Topic 2 - Remove they Pheltz Rule. Yes (3) - WWhickok, Whicker, SirA No ( ) - Topic 4 - Remove this language as it really doesn’t apply anymore as 3 ups will be pretty standard after being based off of the Avg Salary of a players contract and also all happening at the same time of the year. Players who are submitted to the contract committee as 3 Ups are not included in the free agent pool. However, if the contract committee and the team have not agreed on a 3 Up contract by the start of Shark Tank, then that player will be considered eligible for bidding in the Shark Tank Yes (2) - SirA, WWhickok No (0) - Edited July 31, 2019 by SirA1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Yes to topic 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 What is the Pheltz rule? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts