Jump to content

Notable Stats and Observations


Hunter2_1

Recommended Posts

On 10/23/2019 at 1:25 PM, jebrick said:

It is a little misleading.  It is showing the % of double teams but just the overall sacks.  Not win vs double teams.  Still interesting.

Overall sacks or pressure rate?  It seems pretty straightforward to me.  If your in the top right quadrant your having a very impressive year rushing the QB from the edge not taking coverage/down and distance and a billion other factors into account . 

Two takes, Crosby for the raiders getting double teamed on 22% of rush attempts, almost the same as Mack, but he is getting pressure at an extremely low rate.  Do they need to double him or do the raiders just have nobody else that needs to be blocked?  

Watt and Clowney leading this list on double team blocked % rate.  Imagine if they played on the same team, who would the opposing team block?  Too bad we will never know ( anymore).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, waterfish_21 said:

Overall sacks or pressure rate?  It seems pretty straightforward to me.  If your in the top right quadrant your having a very impressive year rushing the QB from the edge not taking coverage/down and distance and a billion other factors into account . 

Two takes, Crosby for the raiders getting double teamed on 22% of rush attempts, almost the same as Mack, but he is getting pressure at an extremely low rate.  Do they need to double him or do the raiders just have nobody else that needs to be blocked?  

Watt and Clowney leading this list on double team blocked % rate.  Imagine if they played on the same team, who would the opposing team block?  Too bad we will never know ( anymore).

Overall win rate is what is said on the chart.  So counting all wins vs % doubled.  So JT Watt and Judon are have good years but not being doubled as much(>14% for Watt).  Mack has less wins than JT Watt(28% vs 29%) but is doubled much more(roughly 23% to Watt's 13%).  Why I said it is a bit misleading is that it should just show wins vs double but I am not sure that would look as impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, sammymvpknight said:

I highly doubt that the Patriots need any extra motivation here. I'm also doubtful that "bulletin board material" even matters in football. So now the Patriots are going to try EXTRA hard to win the game? Winning games is about execution and emotion often messes with execution. The Patriots are going to be ready this week and it will have nothing do to with what Landry accidentally said.

I mean if Bill Belichick is making sure his player know what Landry said, it absolutely matters.

Bill’s not doing that cause he likes to gossip. 

Edited by Dome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team Drives Yds/Dr RK Pts/Dr RK TO/Dr RK INT/Dr RK FUM/Dr RK LOS/Dr RK Plays/Dr RK TOP/Dr RK DSR RK
NE 90 16.71 1 0.30 1 .244 1 .200 1 .044 19 25.40 4 4.39 1 1:58 1 .503 1
SF 65 19.52 2 0.88 2 .185 3 .108 5 .077 7 27.60 13 4.98 2 2:20 2 .560 2
BUF 69 25.13 3 1.10 3 .145 9 .087 10 .058 13 27.01 10 5.45 4 2:28 5 .638 3
CAR 78 26.18 4 1.71 8 .179 4 .115 3 .064 10 27.65 15 5.53 5 2:25 3 .667 6
DEN 76 27.43 5 1.61 6 .079 28 .066 20 .013 30 30.01 28 5.75 9 2:51 17 .654 5
TEN 82 27.91 6 1.37 4 .110 22 .073 16 .037 21 23.83 1 5.38 3 2:30 8 .652 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article below that makes some excellent points about Michael Thomas's production with Brees vs Bridgewater throwing to him. Last season several posters on here seemed to really emphasize that Brees played a significant role in Thomas's production being as good/efficient as it was. However, this article shows that to be a myth as Bridgewater throwing to him has been nearly identical from many different metrics. The significance of this is that Thomas is elite regardless of who is throwing to him.

http://www.nfl.com/photoessays/0ap3000001068913/next-gen-stats-compelling-figures-that-could-shape-week-8

Edited by tyler735
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...