Jump to content

Packers Trade For Nobody Day 557


MacReady

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MrBobGray said:

The entire concept of the Packers trading for a WR1 is absolutely baffling to me.  You really think receiver talent is what's keeping this team from a Super Bowl?  Because we got to see pretty much this exact team with the best WR1 in football for the last two years; how'd those playoffs go again?  Couldn't score 10 points at home last year, so this year we should take from the future to run it back with a much worse WR1? 

team needs more WR2s/3s.  Even if you count Doubs among them, Cobb is a huge ? and so is Watson and so is Watkins.

 

Team needs to field 3, ideally 4 NFL quality WRs every week, and hopefully 3 that have different skills.  Right now we have 1 in Lazard, and some injured guys and a rookie who could be another.  Trading for a WR makes a lot of sense to me.  #1 WR not needed but counting on Cobb or Watkins is asking to be thin in the playoffs.  Those guys are bonuses not part of the plan IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Old Guy said:

More than we got for Davante Adams! 😂

Yes.  Indy has no real need to trade Pittman.  GB  had salary cap/ contract reason to trade Adams.

 

3 hours ago, Old Guy said:

 

And you think he's unreasonable! "a bit of an overpay!" 😅

Factor in the contract situation 

 

3 hours ago, Old Guy said:

Here is where we can agree though, we aren't trading for him. 

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrBobGray said:

The entire concept of the Packers trading for a WR1 is absolutely baffling to me.  You really think receiver talent is what's keeping this team from a Super Bowl?  Because we got to see pretty much this exact team with the best WR1 in football for the last two years; how'd those playoffs go again?  Couldn't score 10 points at home last year, so this year we should take from the future to run it back with a much worse WR1? 

GB needs shiny new toys and playmakerz!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HokieHigh said:

No on amari.

 

Lazard watkins doubs winfree watson would be fine down the stretch. 

Lazard Doubs it's about all we got.  Watson has missed too much time to be a factor.  Winfree?  No.  Watkins if he can get back on the field yah OK.  Dude can't stay healthy.  We do need a Vet add.  If Rodgers doesn't get any protection it's not going to matter anyway.  Cobb could come back in a month.  We'll see.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...