Mazrimiv Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 13 hours ago, Scoremore said: Mossy Cade Tony Mandrich Bruce Clark Charles Martin Brandon Bostic No love for Najah Davenport? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 Charles Woodson Brett Favre James Lofton Grave Digger Reggie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 5, 2021 Author Share Posted December 5, 2021 Ken Ingalls - Packers Cap - I’ve been using the $208.2M cap number since May when the NFL & NFLPA first agreed to this as the 2022 cap ceiling. Nothing changes with any of my cap projections as this was the assumption all along. Packers are effectively $62M+ over the cap next year after the draft, PS, etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 Pretty big gap between 1 and the rest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 25 minutes ago, Leader said: Ken Ingalls - Packers Cap - I’ve been using the $208.2M cap number since May when the NFL & NFLPA first agreed to this as the 2022 cap ceiling. Nothing changes with any of my cap projections as this was the assumption all along. Packers are effectively $62M+ over the cap next year after the draft, PS, etc Ingalls likes to play the "sky is falling" game with the salary cap. It's this simple: extend Rodgers and fill in the rest with whatever you can afford. Do that and you're making the playoffs, guaranteed. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 5, 2021 Author Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 minute ago, packfanfb said: Ingalls likes to play the "sky is falling" game with the salary cap. It's this simple: extend Rodgers and fill in the rest with whatever you can afford. Do that and you're making the playoffs, guaranteed. He's simply reporting the numbers here based on current contracts and not projecting player moves, extensions etc. He will/has done the latter in other tweets - but not this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 4 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Ingalls likes to play the "sky is falling" game with the salary cap. It's this simple: extend Rodgers and fill in the rest with whatever you can afford. Do that and you're making the playoffs, guaranteed. Extending Rodgers clears around $30M. Still a good bit more to clear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, squire12 said: Extending Rodgers clears around $30M. Still a good bit more to clear. Sure I get that, but the Packers are literally proving this year that there is only one player on the team who is irreplaceable...12. So far this year, we've won without several of our highest paid players including 69, 55, 23 (soon to be high paid) and we're even undefeated without 17. So the point is pretty simple: You extend 12 and then do what's necessary to cut, restructure, extend other guys to make it work. As long as we have 12 with LaFleur, 2021 is a blueprint for the type of success you can expect. Edited December 5, 2021 by packfanfb 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: Ingalls likes to play the "sky is falling" game with the salary cap. It's this simple: extend Rodgers and fill in the rest with whatever you can afford. Do that and you're making the playoffs, guaranteed. Totally. He’s very knowledgeable but kind of annoying in that aspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Arthur Penske said: Totally. He’s very knowledgeable but kind of annoying in that aspect. I think he's pretty aware of what he's doing. He behaves this way to draw attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 3 hours ago, Leader said: He's simply reporting the numbers here based on current contracts and not projecting player moves, extensions etc. He will/has done the latter in other tweets - but not this one. he's definitely a "sky is falling" drama guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBPFan Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 Better late than never? Here are my top 5: Bart Starr Aaron Jones Leroy Butler Charles Woodson Donald Driver If it were only about what they did on the field, I'd have to find a way to put Favre and Rodgers in there somehow but they aren't nearly as good off the field so they don't make the list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 3 hours ago, skibrett15 said: I think he's pretty aware of what he's doing. He behaves this way to draw attention. Ya I think that is we we’re getting at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 5, 2021 Author Share Posted December 5, 2021 23 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: Ya I think that is we we’re getting at. Do you disagree factually with anything he posted (?) or just find it annoying? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.