Dr LBC Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 1 minute ago, domepatrol91 said: Well he won’t be able to use his moves if that’s the case I'm now realizing that. And I'm also now quite bitter at Touch for making me have to read rules for the first time in forever. READING RULES IS FOR NERDS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 18, 2018 Author Share Posted January 18, 2018 *******UPDATE EVERYONE ****** It has come to my attention that there was a rule written that I did not intend on having. There is no 3 post daily minimum. However, failure to stay active via voting for two days will result in your death. I have also realized that a good number of people still have not opened their game PM. With the game somewhat being thrust out there, I am extending Day 1 until THURSDAY AT 11PM EASTERN. I apologize for any confusion caused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 Bucs cuz I haven't read anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 5 minutes ago, RuskieTitan said: Bucs cuz I haven't read anything. Obviously bc Bucs ain't playing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 1 hour ago, theuntouchable said: *******UPDATE EVERYONE ****** It has come to my attention that there was a rule written that I did not intend on having. There is no 3 post daily minimum. However, failure to stay active via voting for two days will result in your death. I have also realized that a good number of people still have not opened their game PM. With the game somewhat being thrust out there, I am extending Day 1 until THURSDAY AT 11PM EASTERN. I apologize for any confusion caused. I'm just sad because I thought you just really liked my rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 1 hour ago, Famous Jameis said: Obviously bc Bucs ain't playing Very scummy. Famous Jameis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 VC: Ruskie - 4 (Famous J, ET, LTBF, matts) Mookie - 2 (Raves, utley) LTBF - 1 (LBC) LBC - 1 (gopher tk3 - 1 (jfinley gopher - 1 (tk3 Raves - 1 (Mookie) sanchez - 1 (BCB) Whicker - 1 (ksj) dome - 1 (Whicker) Cwood - 1 (dome Famous J - 1 (Ruskie No vote yet: Ragnarok CWood21 11sanchez11 Hockey5djh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 so ruskie for being a danger to himself and others or mookie for idk is apparantly the leading wagons here. yuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raves Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 I still stand by my sentiment that I stated before the game started, unless we have a definitive read on a scum/other our best bet would be to lynch an inactive D1 as the fact they will be roleblocked will give us 0 information to finding a scum on D2. D1 the only players with information are typically those in chats with each other/given specific information about another player to start so it'd be best to lynch someone that's currently inactive and wouldn't be able to use their ability even if they weren't lynched to provide us extra information to narrow it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raves Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 11sanchez11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopherwrestler Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 if Famous J loses, does he eat the L? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 VC: Ruskie - 4 (Famous J, ET, LTBF, matts) Famous J - 2 (Ruskie, gopher sanchez - 2 (BCB, Raves) Mookie - 1 ( utley) LTBF - 1 (LBC) tk3 - 1 (jfinley gopher - 1 (tk3 Raves - 1 (Mookie) Whicker - 1 (ksj) dome - 1 (Whicker) Cwood - 1 (dome No vote yet: Ragnarok CWood21 11sanchez11 Hockey5djh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 29 minutes ago, Raves said: I still stand by my sentiment that I stated before the game started, unless we have a definitive read on a scum/other our best bet would be to lynch an inactive D1 as the fact they will be roleblocked will give us 0 information to finding a scum on D2. D1 the only players with information are typically those in chats with each other/given specific information about another player to start so it'd be best to lynch someone that's currently inactive and wouldn't be able to use their ability even if they weren't lynched to provide us extra information to narrow it down. Why not CWood then? LBC already said that CWood won’t be around for a few days, which I thought was a strange thing to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raves Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 45 minutes ago, domepatrol91 said: Why not CWood then? LBC already said that CWood won’t be around for a few days, which I thought was a strange thing to say. Either one works for me. With a 75% chance, based on a 15:3:2 ratio which isn't confirmed but matches the ratios of the last 3 games I've played, to hit a civ D1 with a lynch, getting rid of an inactive, which still has a 25% of being against us, we are at least keeping an active player that can use their role ability to get us information on who the scum might be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 1 hour ago, Raves said: I still stand by my sentiment that I stated before the game started, unless we have a definitive read on a scum/other our best bet would be to lynch an inactive D1 as the fact they will be roleblocked will give us 0 information to finding a scum on D2. D1 the only players with information are typically those in chats with each other/given specific information about another player to start so it'd be best to lynch someone that's currently inactive and wouldn't be able to use their ability even if they weren't lynched to provide us extra information to narrow it down. Ruskie is laying low apparently once again and is a danger to all. I could vote for an inactive if there is more of a concensus on voting for an inactive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.