incognito_man Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 1 minute ago, packerjmf said: When are we allowed to start legitimately questioning Aaron? can always question him but if anyone was expecting a fast start on the road in Chicago after zero live action, expectations should be re-examined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheech Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 1 minute ago, SSG said: Rodgers is looking really uncomfortable in this new offense. You think 12 is actually running the plays? He's ******* scared ****less back there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Andy Herman: I have some concerns. Zach Kruse: Aaron Rodgers is all over the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 1 minute ago, HighCalebR said: Lololol I can't wait until this is blamed on missing preseason That 8 plays would have really made the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Just now, Spartacus said: I give him till week 4 to hit his stride. Chicago has made alot of polished Os look terrible too. He cant miss receivers like this though. as long as rodgers wants to play... he has at least all season of slack, if not this season and half of next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 @skibrett15 could legit be as good as Crosby and Rodgers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Just now, Spartacus said: That 8 plays would have really made the difference. He'd be back to pinpoint accuracy FOR SURE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chucknorris101 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 The bears defense is obviously good. Aaron straight up missed Graham and Adams twice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zycho32 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Well, he didn't get sacked and made a solid completion. Progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer_ESP Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 1 minute ago, Uffdaswede said: Field position flipped turnover stonkbsix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Rob Demovsky: This is the first time under Aaron Rodgers that the Packers have negative yards gained (minus-12) through the first three drives in a game, according to ESPN Stats & Info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packerjmf Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: can always question him but if anyone was expecting a fast start on the road in Chicago after zero live action, expectations should be re-examined I didn’t expect a fast start, but I didn’t think 1 first down 3 drives in would be overly optimistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad gluckman Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 I expected a slow start. Not this slow, but still everyone needs to calm down. Its the first 3 drives for an offense that hasnt played together in an actual game vs the best defense in the nfl. Its going to take a lot more than one quarter before we really know what this offense is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 McCarthy watching GB's offense right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Jump ball to MVS ala Janis vs Arizona, DO IT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.