Ray Reed Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 Imagine if this tweet said Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, or Kirk Cousins instead of Aaron Rodgers lmao dang that’s pretty crazy 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A_Biased_Fan Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 4 minutes ago, Ray Reed said: Imagine if this tweet said Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, or Kirk Cousins instead of Aaron Rodgers lmao dang that’s pretty crazy I'd imagine most guys records in those scenarios aren't great, but to be that bad almost seems impossible. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Buck Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 On 1/24/2021 at 7:23 PM, rocky_rams said: There is speculation that Rodgers may not be back in Green Bay. will he go to another team, or is he gonna go for one more run with the Pack? or....does he call it quits after an MVP campaign? I'm guessing this speculation is just coming from fans and talking heads in the media. Rodgers might like another decent wide receiver, but other than that, he actually has it pretty nice in Green Bay. They have a very reliable offensive line, and Aaron Jones, while not the elite of the elite, is still a very good running back. He is on a team that made the NFC Championship the last two years in a row. I'm not sure where he is going to go where the situation is would be a whole lot better for him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocky_rams Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 7 minutes ago, Uncle Buck said: I'm guessing this speculation is just coming from fans and talking heads in the media. Rodgers might like another decent wide receiver, but other than that, he actually has it pretty nice in Green Bay. They have a very reliable offensive line, and Aaron Jones, while not the elite of the elite, is still a very good running back. He is on a team that made the NFC Championship the last two years in a row. I'm not sure where he is going to go where the situation is would be a whole lot better for him. Aaron Jones will not be on the team next season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Buck Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 Just now, rocky_rams said: Aaron Jones will not be on the team next season It shouldn't be too hard to find a replacement for him in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimedes Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Broncofan said: And right on cue, a day after the emotions are allowed to settle..... This is about guaranteeing the contract, and that's a no-brainer. Maybe there's an extension, maybe there isn't. But there's a reason why Vegas has a ridiculous price on Rodgers being in GB to start week 1 2021. That earlier post-game comment was noise, not news. Yeah, emotions were just running a little raw after the game. GB will give Rodgers a new deal and they’ll run it back. I still wonder if GB can clear enough space to where they can trade for another veteran receiver though. I’d bet he’s going to demand the FO acquire another impact player in the passing game, especially if they lose Jones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ray Reed said: Imagine if this tweet said Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, or Kirk Cousins instead of Aaron Rodgers lmao dang that’s pretty Is that correct? Edited January 26, 2021 by squire12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ray Reed said: Imagine if this tweet said Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, or Kirk Cousins instead of Aaron Rodgers lmao dang that’s pretty crazy Week 17 of 2013 season https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201312290chi.htm Trailed the 8-7 Chicago Bears 28 -20 Edited January 26, 2021 by squire12 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Reed Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) 10 minutes ago, squire12 said: Week 17 of 2013 season https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201312290chi.htm Trailed the 8-7 Chicago Bears 28 -20 Yeah someone on twitter brought up that example and the guy's response was "Bears ended 8-8 after that game...they were .500, so not a winning team" which imo is pretty weak and cherry-picky... ...but on the other hand there's still 41 other examples in his career of that being true if he's 0-42 haha...so if that 1 score game against the 8-7 Bears in 2013 is the game that has to be pointed out as busting the stat...idk still pretty crazy to me all things considered...would never have thought that about a Rodgers led team Edited January 26, 2021 by Ray Reed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 7 minutes ago, Ray Reed said: Yeah someone on twitter brought up that example and the guy's response was "Bears ended 8-8 after that game...they were .500, so not a winning team" which imo is pretty weak and cherry-picky... ...but on the other hand there's still 41 other examples in his career of that being true if he's 0-42 haha...so if that 1 score game against the 8-7 Bears in 2013 is the game that has to be pointed out as busting the stat...idk still pretty crazy to me all things considered...would never have thought that about a Rodgers led team Yeah. At the time of the game, Chicago was 8-7. Several games were tied in the 4th. Dallas playoff game in 2014 was 21-20 Dallas with GB winning 26-21. So the more than 1 point detail. Agreed that the track record is not great. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CP3MVP Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 If Montana can leave San Fran and Brady can leave NE Aaron can also leave 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 1 hour ago, squire12 said: Week 17 of 2013 season https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201312290chi.htm Trailed the 8-7 Chicago Bears 28 -20 This was the season where he missed several weeks when he broke his left collarbone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 22 hours ago, NJerseypaint said: You can't just say ignore Gronk like he wasn't one of the best TEs of all time. I wasn't ignoring Gronk. I was talking about WRs. And Rodgers has played with some good, but not great TEs too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkippyX Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 (edited) 4 hours ago, Uncle Buck said: I'm guessing this speculation is just coming from fans and talking heads in the media. Rodgers might like another decent wide receiver, but other than that, he actually has it pretty nice in Green Bay. They have a very reliable offensive line, and Aaron Jones, while not the elite of the elite, is still a very good running back. He is on a team that made the NFC Championship the last two years in a row. I'm not sure where he is going to go where the situation is would be a whole lot better for him. Now take a look at their cap and their free agents. The cap shrinks (they are 28 million in the red) A-A-Ron gets a 15.6 million bump against the cap compared to this year. Zadarius goes up by 4.75 million Preston goes up by 2.5 million Bakhtiari goes up by 3.1 million MVS goes up by 1.4 million A bunch of players get bumps between 250k and 600k Linsley is a UFA Aaron Jones is a UFA Jamaal Williams is a UFA Robert Tonyan is an RFA and someone will pay him (how do they match?) He made 750k this year, it will be 5-8 million next year This team will not improve next year. https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/green-bay-packers/ Edited January 27, 2021 by SkippyX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJerseypaint Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 2 hours ago, CWood21 said: I wasn't ignoring Gronk. I was talking about WRs. And Rodgers has played with some good, but not great TEs too. Yeah, but the real argument is weapons. To only focus on WRs (and eliminating Moss from the pool no less), is an unfair argument. You're basically setting the other side up for an instant loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.