Jump to content

Free Agency 2021


ReggieCamp

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said:

Clowney does it at a much greater size though. 

Takk should clean up some of myles disruptions which will be nice

I think we will get a lot more out of Takk than most people seem to think.

Probably more than we would get out of a DE pick at 26.

That's what he was, and now, with some years of NFL experience, from all I am reading out to prove we was worth it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, bruceb said:

I think we will get a lot more out of Takk than most people seem to think.

Probably more than we would get out of a DE pick at 26.

That's what he was, and now, with some years of NFL experience, from all I am reading out to prove we was worth it.

To be fair, if we sign Clowney I expect an early injury, and if we don’t draft someone then Takk will get a lot of playing time, though maybe the guy we pilfered from Miami is something.  I also wouldn’t mind seeing more of Gustin.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DizzyDean said:

To be fair, if we sign Clowney I expect an early injury, and if we don’t draft someone then Takk will get a lot of playing time, though maybe the guy we pilfered from Miami is something.  I also wouldn’t mind seeing more of Gustin.

Ya, I do not see our solution to Garrett's running mate being one player, no matter who else, if anyone, we acquire or draft.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kiwibrown said:

Clowney does it at a much greater size though. 

Takk should clean up some of myles disruptions which will be nice

I agree, Clowney has to prototype size but I think many are discounting that Takk has freak athleticism as well

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DizzyDean said:

To be fair, if we sign Clowney I expect an early injury, and if we don’t draft someone then Takk will get a lot of playing time, though maybe the guy we pilfered from Miami is something.  I also wouldn’t mind seeing more of Gustin.

Gustin is a wild card for me too. He has shown some flashes as a disruptor and animal in the trenches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DizzyDean said:

He dominated the one game he played significant snaps last year.  I wanted to see more last year.

I would say a dominating game would be multiple sacks ( he had zero sacks last year), multiple QBs (he had 2 QB hits all year last year), living in the backfield with TFLs (he had 2 TFLS all year last year). The game where he played a majority of the snaps, was against Was, where he took 83% of the snaps, no sacks, no QB hits, and no TFLs. No exactly what I want from my DE. He is a solid back up but he shouldn’t be on the 2 deep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DizzyDean said:

 I also wouldn’t mind seeing more of Gustin.

Meh, I would like to see more production. He was ok last year, with larger expectations from me, he and pretty much everyone outside of Myles and OV were disappointments in my book, they all can be replaced.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, bruceb said:

I think we will get a lot more out of Takk than most people seem to think.

Probably more than we would get out of a DE pick at 26.

That's what he was, and now, with some years of NFL experience, from all I am reading out to prove we was worth it.

ImperturbableBouncyArabianoryx-max-1mb.g

Edited by DaWg_LB.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we're also discounting Curtis Wright.

He was INSANELY productive in college.

He's not Uber athletic but he just gets production.

All that being said I agree we draft someone.   We would have a rotation of Garrett, Takk, our draft pick, wright, and Gustin.  I think that will be passable at worst and depending on what takk brings and what the rookie has could be very effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...