Jump to content

Saquan Barkley Pick is looking like a bad pick


Vladimir L

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Daniel said:

Yeah, RB in the first is generally a bad idea.  And don't come at me with the why not WRs argument.

As for why WR is different: because you can consistently find waiver wire RBs that can do a RB1 job.  Are they as good as an elite RB?  No, but the dropoff isn't that big.

Do you have any evidence that shows that it is easier to find a late-round or waiver wire RB1 production than to do the same with a WR1 production? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 QBs that draft

2 are franchisers(did they become franchise QBs because they went to teams with everything in place already?)

jury still out on Baker

3 of the 5 Rd1 QBs are better than average

I think the highest stat producer of franchise QBs is the Heisman trophy winner; after Baker went, there was 1 Heisman winner left and he was the safest bet.

I don't really see why this needs to be a thread for a guy who took a lot of injuries

no one wants to talk about 2017 and the 7 people picked before Mahomes, CMC & Watson??

I was really excited to see Saquon play after being drafted; and I still am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBLIII said:

it doesn't work very well in the passing league anyway. Even if he is the 2nd coming of Jim Brown.

With the exception of the 4th quarter with a big lead that your trying to salt away, every time you hand the ball off to a RB the defense cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CP3MVP said:

With the exception of the 4th quarter with a big lead that your trying to salt away, every time you hand the ball off to a RB the defense cheers

Unless they defense is the Packers and the team handing it off is the niners. 

Amiright? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think About it the more i disagree with this notion that you don’t draft a RB high. Especially today. If Saquon was just a pure runner then sure. But he’s a threat in the passing game which great added value to the ground game. Plus if you don’t surround that RB with help around him whether it be a dynamic receiver or a good line then that’s an indictment on the FO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kip Smithers said:

The more I think About it the more i disagree with this notion that you don’t draft a RB high. Especially today. If Saquon was just a pure runner then sure. But he’s a threat in the passing game which great added value to the ground game. Plus if you don’t surround that RB with help around him whether it be a dynamic receiver or a good line then that’s an indictment on the FO. 

That help is supposed to come from picks like #2 overall. You only get capitol like that once in a blue moon, or if you’re the Jets. Many needs are near impossible to fill if you don’t use a high first rounder (QB, pass rusher, and lockdown CB to a lesser extent).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...