Jump to content

Owners approve postseason overtime rule ensuring both teams get a possession


RaidersAreOne

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Forge said:

Honestly, that has never really been a thing. There are rule changes pretty much every year, especially over the last 25 years or so. They just vary in terms of their importance and impact and how much we notice them. 

Yea I guess you're right 

I think they just didn't advertise it as much back in the early 2000s

Or as you mentioned, they weren't as significant 

Just seems like they want to visit every rule nowadays 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BucsDraftGeek47 said:

Yea I guess you're right 

I think they just didn't advertise it as much back in the early 2000s

Or as you mentioned, they weren't as significant 

Just seems like they want to visit every rule nowadays 

The current landscape of cray passing started in the early 2000's. The Ty Law rule changes were 2004, IIRC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The perfect OT system IMO:

 

- Each team gets five PAT tries. Like in regulation time, you can either kick from the 15 yard line for 1 point, or score a TD from the 2 yard line for 2 points.

 

- Most points at the end of 5 tries wins. 

 

- If tied after 5 tries then you alternate 2 point conversions until someone scores and the other misses.

 

 

Advantages of this system:

 

- Involves all 3 phases of the game. Off, Def and ST.

- Interesting decision for the coaches, how many times do you go for 2 vs how many “safe” XP kicks for 1? 

- It’s only 10 snaps total + potential sudden death snaps. No keeping teams out for a while extra quarter and risking injuries.

- There wouldn’t be a huge advantage to winning the coin toss. I’d imagine you’d choose to go 2nd to know when to go for 2, but it wouldn’t be as slanted as it is now.

- A winner is guaranteed to emerge. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaking of yelling at clouds...
 

"If you couldn't beat them in regulation, and you couldn't stop them from marching down for an immediate touchdown in overtime, then you should still get another chance to win. The participation trophy generation got their overtime rule changed."

 

2fc0fdf275b1865303cc5b60f889561f_640x640

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Shanedorf said:

speaking of yelling at clouds...
 

"If you couldn't beat them in regulation, and you couldn't stop them from marching down for an immediate touchdown in overtime, then you should still get another chance to win. The participation trophy generation got their overtime rule changed."

 

2fc0fdf275b1865303cc5b60f889561f_640x640

NEIPA? 

New England IPA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, paul-mac said:

The perfect OT system IMO:

 

- Each team gets five PAT tries. Like in regulation time, you can either kick from the 15 yard line for 1 point, or score a TD from the 2 yard line for 2 points.

 

- Most points at the end of 5 tries wins. 

 

- If tied after 5 tries then you alternate 2 point conversions until someone scores and the other misses.

 

 

Advantages of this system:

 

- Involves all 3 phases of the game. Off, Def and ST.

- Interesting decision for the coaches, how many times do you go for 2 vs how many “safe” XP kicks for 1? 

- It’s only 10 snaps total + potential sudden death snaps. No keeping teams out for a while extra quarter and risking injuries.

- There wouldn’t be a huge advantage to winning the coin toss. I’d imagine you’d choose to go 2nd to know when to go for 2, but it wouldn’t be as slanted as it is now.

- A winner is guaranteed to emerge. 

 

Con: boring af

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Geezy said:

Now it’s going to be that it isn’t fair because the losing team didn’t get a 2nd possession lol 

^ This, right here

The outrage when two teams that are heavily offense slanted get to the second possession and Josh Allen watches as Mahomes only needed a FG to win and end the game after he went blow for blow and matched him TD for TD including in OT

Edited by wackywabbit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Forge said:

Honestly, that has never really been a thing. There are rule changes pretty much every year, especially over the last 25 years or so. They just vary in terms of their importance and impact and how much we notice them. 

This. The internet has expanded awareness of this kind of thing, too. This kind of thing wouldn't have gotten like, prime Sportscenter coverage or anything, so you'd have probably found out about a rule change like this on the first broadcast it became relevant in lol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, wackywabbit said:

^ This, right here

The outrage when two teams that are heavily offense slanted get to the second possession and Josh Allen watches as Mahomes only needed a FG to win and end the game after he went blow for blow and matched him TD for TD including in OT

Go for two then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...