Thelonebillsfan Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 I mean it's him or Bryce Perkins, might as well see if you can get anything out of him since Stafford's career is over and you've got nobody else in that building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indifference Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Baker stinks i remember that thread @Forgemade about him getting a bigger contract Flat out awful qb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyler735 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 (edited) Rams seem like the best fit for Mayfield. Not as a QB, but the Progressive commercials have probably been the high point in his career, so why not go to LA and see if you can find another acting gig 😂 Edited December 6, 2022 by tyler735 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 33 minutes ago, indifference said: Baker stinks i remember that thread @Forgemade about him getting a bigger contract Flat out awful qb I didn't start that thread. Our conversation was basically about front offices doing stupid stuff, not on the ability of Baker (the idea would have been that baker's play would have been the same). I've been one of the most consistent anti Baker people on this board. Cleveland held him and bottomed him out which was a good move. Of course, they did do by trading assets for Watson and giving him a fully guaranteed deal, which kind of goes back to my point about front offices doing stupid stuff. One of my responses to you was about Denver, Pitt and Washington potentially going after him and giving him a decent deal. One team made a trade for a QB that may set their team back half a decade, one traded for Carson Wentz, and one signed trubisky and used a first on Kenny Pickett. Teams do stupid stuff when it comes to QB. The only one of those moves that may be good is the Pickett selection, and that's before considering other moves such as Matt Ryan. The set of circumstances precluded anyone from having to fall on the Baker grenade before he really showed out as a straight up awful, non starting caliber QB rather than something closer to an average QB. I don't know if that happens if Cleveland doesn't land Watson. Just means a team will likely do it with someone else now, which is kind of the point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calamity_Cometh Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Remember that game where Mac Jones had like 3 passes? That'll be Thursday if Baker plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indifference Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 35 minutes ago, Forge said: I didn't start that thread. Our conversation was basically about front offices doing stupid stuff, not on the ability of Baker (the idea would have been that baker's play would have been the same). I've been one of the most consistent anti Baker people on this board. Cleveland held him and bottomed him out which was a good move. Of course, they did do by trading assets for Watson and giving him a fully guaranteed deal, which kind of goes back to my point about front offices doing stupid stuff. One of my responses to you was about Denver, Pitt and Washington potentially going after him and giving him a decent deal. One team made a trade for a QB that may set their team back half a decade, one traded for Carson Wentz, and one signed trubisky and used a first on Kenny Pickett. Teams do stupid stuff when it comes to QB. The only one of those moves that may be good is the Pickett selection, and that's before considering other moves such as Matt Ryan. The set of circumstances precluded anyone from having to fall on the Baker grenade before he really showed out as a straight up awful, non starting caliber QB rather than something closer to an average QB. I don't know if that happens if Cleveland doesn't land Watson. Just means a team will likely do it with someone else now, which is kind of the point. teams absolutely do stupid stuff, but with #6? I knew no team in the right mind would pay him a Teddy B type deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 20 minutes ago, Calamity_Cometh said: Remember that game where Mac Jones had like 3 passes? That'll be Thursday if Baker plays. Good thing the Rams have such an elite core of RBs then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Baker will light up the packers defense and officially arrive How is baker on crossers @MWil23? Our defense loves giving up massive yards there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 30 minutes ago, Malfatron said: Baker will light up the packers defense and officially arrive How is baker on crossers @MWil23? Our defense loves giving up massive yards there He gets those batted down all the time at the LOS. Not even joking. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 4 hours ago, evilpimp972 said: The difference between them is that neither had the roster Baker had in Cleveland (and btw Baker didn't look like a competent QB last year), this is what you're arguing btw : "situation matters". Not the point, Geno is playing better than Baker ever did, without the benefit of a elite oline and run game to support him, the team is living and dying by Geno's arm, that never happened with Baker Baker looked like a competent QB before he severely injured his shoulder last year. I don't care what Geno is doing. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove. Quote He's already benched and released, been an immature SOB since his college days, stop acting like this is the kind of leader you want. Don't care. I do want him. I don't want Wentz. And looky there, the Rams got him. Yay me. 2 hours ago, MKnight82 said: Called it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Calamity_Cometh said: Remember that game where Mac Jones had like 3 passes? That'll be Thursday if Baker plays. He's not starting on Thursday. Those who watch will receive the traumatic experience of watching John Wolford try to play QB. Edited December 6, 2022 by jrry32 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 6 minutes ago, jrry32 said: He's not starting on Thursday. Those who watch will receive the traumatic experience of watching John Wolford try to play QB. No one is watching that game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 6 minutes ago, jrry32 said: He's not starting on Thursday. Those who watch will receive the traumatic experience of watching John Wolford try to play QB. All of us non Rams fans will surely be praying for your traumatic experience and suffering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, MWil23 said: All of us non Rams fans will surely be praying for your traumatic experience and suffering. I look forward to the day we let Baker cook. Tutu Atwell will be happy. Wolford's weak arm cost him a 75 yard TD last week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, jrry32 said: I look forward to the day we let Baker cook. Tutu Atwell will be happy. Wolford's weak arm cost him a 75 yard TD last week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.