Packerraymond Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, badgers0821 said: I can’t see Tampa or Rakestraw as serious options due to their low athletic profile and RAS scores. It’s just not the Packer way. We don't know their RAS scores, only ran at Pro Day. Packers will go off their hand times, have had drastically different numbers for guys vs the consensus, most recently Jayden Reed. Tape for both is good enough to consider at 41. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgers0821 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: We don't know their RAS scores, only ran at Pro Day. Packers will go off their hand times, have had drastically different numbers for guys vs the consensus, most recently Jayden Reed. Tape for both is good enough to consider at 41. Both had sub 7 RAS scores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgers0821 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) Personally I’m hopping they move up a few spots and grab one of the following: 1. E. Cooper 2. J. Newton (pending medical) 3. K. McKinstry 4. C. DeJean This would be crazy to me but I’d still be interested in 5. K. Suamataia Spoiler Spoiler Edited April 26 by badgers0821 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, badgers0821 said: Personally I’m hopping they move up a few spots and grab one of the following: 1. E. Cooper 2. J. Newton (pending medical) 3. K. McKinstry 4. C. DeJean This would be crazy to me but I’d still be interested in 5. K. Suamataia Hide contents Hide contents If there's 5 guys you want and there are 8 picks in the second round before you pick, why on earth would you trade up? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Refugee Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: If there's 5 guys you want and there are 8 picks in the second round before you pick, why on earth would you trade up? In general, I agree but if you feel one is a clear cut above everyone else at his position group I could see the move up. We’ll see how they feel about the safeties and ILBs available today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Concerns about Rakestraw should really only be about his size. His testing was slower than he actually plays, because he was coming off of surgery. If you watch him play, he has everything you want. But, he is also 5'11 at the combine and 183 pounds. That is an inch taller than Jaire, but also 13 pounds lighter. According to Wikipedia numbers, Rakestraw is the same size as Shemar Jean-Charles. In my mind, Rakestraw is too light to hold up at CB for the Packers. I am guessing that someone else will overlook his stature before the Packers are comfortable doing so. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 who's excited to have Will Shipley join the team late tonight? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: who's excited to have Will Shipley join the team late tonight? You and @beekay414 only. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umphrey Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 The luxury pick I really want is a day 2 RB. It’s the one position where another playmaker really fits in for Jordan Love and then we wouldn’t have to run Jacob’s into the ground. Dillon is a #3 anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: You and @beekay414 only. and @JBURGE it looks like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 I want to know what Jen Sterger thought of last night's Penix pic 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgers0821 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 13 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: If there's 5 guys you want and there are 8 picks in the second round before you pick, why on earth would you trade up? I’m no mathematician but there’s a possibility all 5 of them get taken before pick 41 no? Maybe if they all played the same position the likelihood would be less but why take a chance when it wouldn’t cost you much to move up 4-5 spots to ensure you get one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgers0821 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 And I want Bullard at 58! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, incognito_man said: and @JBURGE it looks like I mean I want Brooks late 2, but I'd take Shipley in the late 3rd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Safe to say he's not pleased... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts