ChazStandard Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Seriously, he speared his helmet right into Higgin's earhole, is that not a penalty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTrav Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, DawgX said: And should have been a helmet to helmet penalty. BS. Agreed on that too. Sorenson was a viking missile there, helmet as a weapon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TypicalBrowns10 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Typical browns... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbadbuff Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 I mean what is the logic behind this rule? Every other spot of the field you get the ball. Ontop of the helmet to helmet. Gross. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pats#1 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Wow that definitely should have been helmet to helmet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sad People Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 That looked like penalty to me on the KC DB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swoosh Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Browns get screwed by a stupid rule and a missed call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 It's a bad rule I'm doubt if there was a poll about whether it is a good rule or a bad rule if it would even have 10% support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefer Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 I love this rule so much why do people want to change it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkippyX Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, sdrawkcab321 said: Stupidest rule in sports The pylon counting as a TD is way more stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apparition Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Right? **** makes no damn sense. Just now, bigbadbuff said: I mean what is the logic behind this rule? Every other spot of the field you get the ball. Ontop of the helmet to helmet. Gross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seminoles1 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, Billy86 said: Which rule? I replayed to see if I missed something and genuinely don't get what you mean? The fumble through the end zone out of bounds going to the defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbadbuff Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, Billy86 said: Which rule? I replayed to see if I missed something and genuinely don't get what you mean? Fumble through the end zone = touch back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: yeah, that looks like a touchback I definitely hate that rule though I mean, if a team punts/kicks a ball going out of bonds in the end zone, it shouldn't be a touch back? It's the same rule... You can say there should be some additional conditional rule in the case of a fumble, but it's not like this a special rule coming into affect or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingseanjohn Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, ChazStandard said: Seriously, he speared his helmet right into Higgin's earhole, is that not a penalty? I'm obviously bias here. But in that situation, what's the defensive player suppose to do? Kick him? Just not try to stop/tackle him? There's no way to avoid it in that specific situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts