Kmart128 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, TheKillerNacho said: I mean, if a team punts/kicks a ball going out of bonds in the end zone, it shouldn't be a touch back? It's the same rule... You can say there should be some additional conditional rule in the case of a fumble, but it's not like this a special rule coming into affect or something Well if you fumble forward and it goes out of bounds anywhere else doesnt it go back to where player fumbled to prevent players from fumbling on purpose to get extra yards. Why wouldnt that go back to previous spot? Its just inconsistent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJaxxenGuy Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 11 minutes ago, CP3MVP said: I made a thread about Kelce a month ago asking if he’s an “all time” great TE. It’s interesting how the networks or debate shows don’t pick up on this. Cause it would take away from the Mahomes love Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbadbuff Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, TheKillerNacho said: Not sure what you mean. If kicking rules should be applied then why not kickoff and get the ball out at the 10 yard line for example and maintain possession? Why does one kicking rule translate and not the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdrawkcab321 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, Bearerofnews said: Browns defense is garbage Worse than garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, TheKillerNacho said: I mean, if a team punts/kicks a ball going out of bonds in the end zone, it shouldn't be a touch back? It's the same rule... You can say there should be some additional conditional rule in the case of a fumble, but it's not like this a special rule coming into affect or something the difference is that kicking/punting is a change of possession the big issue with this ruling is that it is assumes a fumble out of bounds as a change of possession, without the other team actually recovering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTrav Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Made up for the drop Tyreek ma boy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingseanjohn Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, ChazStandard said: My bad. I didn't realise Sorensen doesn't have any arms. While running perpendicular towards someone and trying to tackle them while they are diving forward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jofos Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, JohnCena said: Is anyone really surprised the penalty wasn't called smh it's the Chiefs. There are bad calls in every game. That was a bad call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalixar Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 So what SB do the refs want this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, seminoles1 said: So what is the logic for this rule? Like when it was implemented, what was the reasoning? I think the only precedent they have to point to for an offense controlled ball going out of the scoring end zone would be a punt or a field goal kicked through the back of the end zone, so they go with that. It's an odd rule. But it's a weird thing where there isn't much intuitive in the rest of the rulebook to apply to that situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkippyX Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, JohnCena said: Is anyone really surprised the penalty wasn't called smh it's the Chiefs. The helmet thing? They call that if its helmet to helmet or if you are spearing a QB in the pocket. This was a lead with the helmet into the guys arm, maybe shoulder. If you called every penalty by reviewing the play for 30 seconds then its a technical violation. I'm not sure I've ever seen a helmet to bicep of a diving player call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pats#1 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 The horribleness and impact of that helmet to helmet no call just can’t be understated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seminoles1 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, waterfish_21 said: I like the rule. Posses the ball into the endzone , what so hard to understand. Why does possession go to the defense though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOaktown_56 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 If someone thinks it's premature to say ball game, they either haven't watched the Chiefs. It blows, but it is what it is. (PS if I jinx this, everyone quote me and i'll be happy to be wrong). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgX Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 If they score a TD here it's over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts