NYRaider Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, CWood21 said: It wouldn't surprise me if Burrow was lobbying for Chase. If he wasn't, I'd be a bit concerned. Sewell is the logical choice, Chase is the heart choice. IF the Bengals are truly about making sure Joe Burrow succeeds, I don't see how picking Chase over Sewell is the answer. If they go Chase at #5 they could target Radunz, Eichenberg, Cosmi, or Mayfield at #38 or with a trade up back into the back end of the 1st round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Just now, NYRaider said: If they go Chase at #5 they could target Radunz, Eichenberg, Cosmi, or Mayfield at #38 or with a trade up back into the back end of the 1st round. They'd have to fall. We all know the Bengals move about once in a blue moon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 4 minutes ago, NYRaider said: If they go Chase at #5 they could target Radunz, Eichenberg, Cosmi, or Mayfield at #38 or with a trade up back into the back end of the 1st round. Or you go Penei Sewell at 5, and then grab Rashod Bateman, Terrance Marshall, or Kadarius Toney. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargers Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 46 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Or you go Penei Sewell at 5, and then grab Rashod Bateman, Terrance Marshall, or Kadarius Toney. C'mon now lets not be reasonable about things. I for one applaud the Bengals bravado if they take Chase over Sewell, the same way I would every other team between 1-12 NOT taking Sewell. That unlucky #13 team however can be unfortunate enough to draft him though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 4 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said: big oof Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinSting Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 This is the most drama about the #3 pick in NFL history. Because the #1 pick has never been more set in stone. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 Just now, FinSting said: This is the most drama about the #3 pick in NFL history. Because the #1 pick has never been more set in stone. I wouldnt say that. Plenty of years where the first pick was set in stone way before the draft. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 24 minutes ago, FinSting said: This is the most drama about the #3 pick in NFL history. Because the #1 pick has never been more set in stone. Luck, RG3 were locks at 1 and 2. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 38 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said: Fields confirmed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr A W Niloc Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 11 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said: Quote "кто сказал 'A'..." Old Russian saying: "Once you've said 'A'...[you must say 'B'.]" Once San Francisco traded up to third, which is only necessary if choosing Justin Fields, they became logically committed to taking Fields. (We assume Trevor Lawrence and Zach Wilson are gone.) However, the wheel is still in spin. If the Alabama Pro Day can convince John Lynch that Mac Jones can do as well in San Fran as the more mobile but less polished Fields the 49ers can trade down a few spots and still get their franchise QB. Due diligence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 20 minutes ago, Dr A W Niloc said: Once San Francisco traded up to third, which is only necessary if choosing Justin Fields, they became logically committed to taking Fields. (We assume Trevor Lawrence and Zach Wilson are gone.) However, the wheel is still in spin. If the Alabama Pro Day can convince John Lynch that Mac Jones can do as well in San Fran as the more mobile but less polished Fields the 49ers can trade down a few spots and still get their franchise QB. Due diligence. Are they? I heard previously that the pick was Lance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49ersfan Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 18 minutes ago, Dr A W Niloc said: Once San Francisco traded up to third, which is only necessary if choosing Justin Fields, they became logically committed to taking Fields. (We assume Trevor Lawrence and Zach Wilson are gone.) However, the wheel is still in spin. If the Alabama Pro Day can convince John Lynch that Mac Jones can do as well in San Fran as the more mobile but less polished Fields the 49ers can trade down a few spots and still get their franchise QB. Due diligence. One thing to note is the Niners are very heavy on smokescreens. In 2017, the Niners attended Mahomes pro day when they had no intention of drafting him (doh!) In 2020, Chris Simms knew the Niners loved Brandon Aiyuk, yet he never broadcast that information. Also in 2020, the Niners insisted Joe Staley was their LT right until they traded for Trent Williams. Staley retired minutes after the trade And in 2021, the Niners insisted Jimmy G was their guy from December-March....until they executed the trade up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnChimpo Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 1 hour ago, KingOfNewYork said: It’s dated 3/28, but Alabama had their pro day on 3/23. What am I missing? Seems like Lance or Fields to me. What is it about Fields that makes him a bad scheme fit? I think I read that earlier in the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadpulse Posted March 29, 2021 Share Posted March 29, 2021 5 minutes ago, JohnChimpo said: It’s dated 3/28, but Alabama had their pro day on 3/23. What am I missing? Pro Day #2 is on the 30th 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.