minutemancl Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 STL doesn't have the ammo to bowl us over with an offer. Cleveland does though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 https://mobile.twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/978745933566566401 ooooof my heart can’t take this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancerman Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 The Rams need to do this today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minutemancl Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 33 minutes ago, El ramster said: https://mobile.twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/978745933566566401 ooooof my heart can’t take this Another report by Pat Leonard, this time with help from his buddy Gary Myers. You should know those two are the sports writing equivalents of a clickbait buzzfeed headline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 37 minutes ago, El ramster said: https://mobile.twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/978745933566566401 ooooof my heart can’t take this Rams going after everyone!... Although i assume its fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 6 hours ago, game3525 said: Odell for just the 23rd is an awful trade for the Giants. The Rams need to offer more picks or an above-average young player in return to go along with the pick to even get me to consider it. You're kind of right. The fact that Odell is in the last year of his deal hurts his value. But this is why I, personally, would be hesitant to trade for him. I could do #23 for Odell, but more than that is too much for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gmen Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 The only call I would take is the Browns calling with the #4 pick. That would allow the Giants to replace OBJ with Saquon Barkley. The Rams can take a hike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 15 minutes ago, Gmen said: The only call I would take is the Browns calling with the #4 pick. That would allow the Giants to replace OBJ with Saquon Barkley. The Rams can take a hike. Eli sucks. And I'm out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minutemancl Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 EDIT: Its a joke apparently. Nothing to see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49erurtaza Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 He ain't getting traded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACO Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 TWO 1sts? They funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cddolphin Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Just now, ACO said: TWO 1sts? They funny. If that's the asking price, a 1st and 3rd would probably get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deuces22wild Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Not sure if this has been mentioned but D.J. and Bucky floated the idea of the Browns moving the 4th and 33rd pick for him. 25 years old I don’t think “asking” for 2-1’s is that crazy. As long as a team feels comfortable that he’s not going to go off the rails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minutemancl Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 The Giants do not want to trade him. Getting 2 firsts could potentially be too much to say no to. Trading Odell for less objectively makes the team worse, not better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbadbuff23835 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Yeah that means they don’t want to trade him if that’s the case. He’s in a walk year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.