Jump to content

Week 12 Post Game: We won, so nobody cares


Norm

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Pugger said:

Evidently he said this right after he signed with the Bears so I assumed he was talking about GB.

Odd comment. If it was made after signing with CHI "this team" would be CHI......IMO at least.
Not sure what it is about CHI - a team he hadnt played a down for yet - that makes him think they're into winning more than GB.
Regardless....who cares. He's gone and though I've not compared stats, I think Tonyans more than ably replaced him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Leader said:

Odd comment. If it was made after signing with CHI "this team" would be CHI......IMO at least.
Not sure what it is about CHI - a team he hadnt played a down for yet - that makes him think they're into winning more than GB.
Regardless....who cares. He's gone and though I've not compared stats, I think Tonyans more than ably replaced him.

Tonyan is making considerably less coin than Graham!  He's caught 7 td's this year compared to Graham's 5 in 2 years with the Packers.  His blocking is heads and tails better than Jimmy ..... so yes, he's more than ably replaced him.   

Edited by coachbuns
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Leader said:

Ben Fennell -    No 3-man rushes vs CHI

4man Rush: 44 snaps
5man Rush: 8 snaps
7man/Cover 0: 1 Snap

More 5 man rush snaps ... more 5 man rush snaps.  Put the heat on some of these statues like the upcoming Wentz.

Edited by coachbuns
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, coachbuns said:

LOL .. Ok Kirky's dad. Pretty  harsh reaction; kirksey has not been that good.


I don’t care about Kirksey, he was awful slow on that play, and Barnes and Martin have flashed more often than him. But saying you have no idea what he’s doing on that play?  Outright ridiculous.  

**** these nitwits trying to make a name for themselves on Twitter by ****ting on players with horse**** takes. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Leader said:

Ben Fennell -    No 3-man rushes vs CHI

4man Rush: 44 snaps
5man Rush: 8 snaps
7man/Cover 0: 1 Snap

Can someone smarter than me answer this question for me on why we don't blitz more? We have such a good secondary and 3 EDGE rushers, why not said the extra guy? Trust our secondary and put more pressure on the QB to make a mistake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rainmaker90 said:

Can someone smarter than me answer this question for me on why we don't blitz more? We have such a good secondary and 3 EDGE rushers, why not said the extra guy? Trust our secondary and put more pressure on the QB to make a mistake

our DC is petrified of giving up big plays

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Rainmaker90 said:

Can someone smarter than me answer this question for me on why we don't blitz more? We have such a good secondary and 3 EDGE rushers, why not said the extra guy? Trust our secondary and put more pressure on the QB to make a mistake

Pettine playing chess when everyone else is playing checkers.  He's saving those defensive sets for the playoffs.

That's the only answer to the question.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...