Leader Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 1 minute ago, Leader said: One things for sure......the WR room will have been refreshed quickly enough Now...if they could do the same for the TE room....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 2 minutes ago, Leader said: One things for sure......the WR room will have been refreshed quickly enough Yep .. then in the draft we land one of the top TE's .. Mayer, Washington, Kincaid. We'd have the following cast for 2023. QB Love RB Jones WR Christian Watson WR Romeo Doubs WR Elijah Moore TE Mayer, Washington, or Kincaid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddfather Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 1 hour ago, Outpost31 said: Rodgers to the Broncos was a done deal until the Seahawks swooped in with a better offer for a younger QB. Rodgers is going to be a Jet. And he’s going to get to the Championship game. And he’s going to take a sack on 4th down to lose. If he really wants to continue his transition to becoming Favre he should probably end the championship game with a back breaking interception. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLGURU Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 40 minutes ago, packfanfb said: We could use a bit of that kind of attitude IMO. Guys like Stefon Diggs and A.J. Brown throw tantrums from time to time, but they live up to it on the field. Not saying Moore is that caliber but it's the same idea. Sometimes that attitude is needed. You don't want any part of that with a new developing QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 1 hour ago, Mr. Fussnputz said: If Rodgers is traded to the Jets, it will be after June 1 to spread the dead money over two years. Therefore no pick coming from the 2023 draft, but probably a player and a pick from the 2024 draft. I want Quinnen Williams. We're not getting Quinnen Williams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 26 minutes ago, gizmo2012 said: For a 40 year old QB coming of a bad year? If the Packers get a first round for Rodgers and they take his contract then take that in a minute. His value was last year not next year. Did you quote the wrong guy here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzPackfan Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 2 hours ago, {Family Ghost} said: Nope .. Packers will probably eat the 40 mil this year and then be done with any future Rodgers contract ramifications. The problem with a pre June 1 trade is that we would need to clear an extra 9m in cap space before the league year starts Given they are already well in the deficit, it means pushing more money out to 2024/2025 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzPackfan Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Sandy said: Thank you, I sometimes feel like the only one who could see through the "post June 1st" bull****. It saves us zero dollars in the cap in the long run, and just prolongs our pain and doesn't net us any draft picks this year. It's the worst of both worlds. What also prolongs our pain is moving money in contracts of Bahktiari, Smith, Alexander, Clark in order to accommodate the extra 9m we need to take as a dead cap for Rodgers Edited January 26, 2023 by OzPackfan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 22 minutes ago, OzPackfan said: The problem with a pre June 1 trade is that we would need to clear an extra 9m in cap space before the league year starts Given they are already well in the deficit, it means pushing more money out to 2024/2025 Yeah, no doubt, but I still think they would want to get Rodgers off the books as soon as possible. Those other guys would presumably still be playing in 2023 and maybe 2024 for the Packers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 1 hour ago, OzPackfan said: The problem with a pre June 1 trade is that we would need to clear an extra 9m in cap space before the league year starts Given they are already well in the deficit, it means pushing more money out to 2024/2025 GB has the ability to create that cap space if they would want to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzPackfan Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 39 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: Yeah, no doubt, but I still think they would want to get Rodgers off the books as soon as possible. Those other guys would presumably still be playing in 2023 and maybe 2024 for the Packers. If you do a max restructure of Bahktiari's contract then he is on the books for 41m in 2024 and even if he is then still released he carries nearly 19m in dead cap charges Same with Jones, a max restructure puts his dead cap charges should he be released in 2024 at over 17m Thats 36m for those 2 compared to 24m of Rodgers if he was a post June 1 cut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzPackfan Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, squire12 said: GB has the ability to create that cap space if they would want to do so. Of course but it just pushes money back to 2024 and 2025. There no way out of this with trading Rodgers and it not affecting the cap in 2024 or 2025 somehow (whether that be Rodgers dead cap charges or other players dead cap charges) It all just comes down to how the Packers think they are best served making it all work Edited January 26, 2023 by OzPackfan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 5 minutes ago, OzPackfan said: Of course but it just pushes money back to 2024 and 2025. There no way out of this with trading Rodgers and it not affecting the cap in 2024 or 2025 somehow (whether that be Rodgers dead cap charges or other players dead cap charges) It all just comes down to how the Packers think they are best served making it all work I will need to look at the numbers, but I don't know that it makes that big of a difference if you consider the consecutive years as a collective vs individually Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 3 hours ago, NFLGURU said: You don't want any part of that with a new developing QB. That stuff is typically way overblown. The Chiefs sign every clown around the league and they are a top 3 team every year. Their locker room is just fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 While I think many are over estimating Rodger's worth at his age, you have to wonder if Hackett has essentially gotten two jobs because of his links to Rodgers and/or Rodgers performance under him. And if that is the case an owner may push for more than you'd think to get him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.