incognito_man Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 I don't think they put up more than 13 against our defense. So that's my cap unless they find a defensive or ST score/big play. Could see our offense have to fight for it, but think our running game is strong enough to build a couple scoring drives and our passing game has obvious big play potential. 20-13 GB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uffdaswede Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 2 hours ago, incognito_man said: I don't think they put up more than 13 against our defense. So that's my cap unless they find a defensive or ST score/big play. Could see our offense have to fight for it, but think our running game is strong enough to build a couple scoring drives and our passing game has obvious big play potential. 20-13 GB Only one missed XP? I’ll take that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, Uffdaswede said: Only one missed XP? I’ll take that! 7 + 3 + 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReadyToThump Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 The Packers cannot afford another slow start to the season. The last two week one games they were outscored 61-10. Absolutely pathetic. I think MLF has obviously taken a different approach to try and change that, more physical and more conditioning in TC and having the starters play a good amount in the preseason. This team better be ready to ******* thump on Sunday. The bears have been the Packers' blowup doll for the better part of the past 30 years. They sense blood in the water with Rodgers leaving and will be playing like this is their Superbowl (because it is lol). A few of my keys to winning the game: -win the TO battle, Fields is usually good for 1 or 2 turnovers a game -pound the ******* rock, we are far superior in the trenches on both sides, use it to our advantage -play action, motion, slow the game down for Love -contain Fields and YAC plays -stop the run and make the QB play QB, Fields is horrible when his first read is covered Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 41 minutes ago, Uffdaswede said: Only one missed XP? I’ll take that! No, there's 4. 4 TDs, each 6pts = 24 But missed 4 XPs so 24-4 = 20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 Not winning the Super Bowl this year, so all I care about is good defense. If the Bears score 25 points or more in this game, Barry shouldn’t be fired, he should just be one of those things where it’s announced he’s not returning. Same as LaFleur, Gute and Murphy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 41 minutes ago, MacReady said: Not winning the Super Bowl this year, so all I care about is good defense. If the Bears score 25 points or more in this game, Barry shouldn’t be fired, he should just be one of those things where it’s announced he’s not returning. Same as LaFleur, Gute and Murphy. Jordan Love will never win another Super Bowl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 23 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Jordan Love will never win another Super Bowl. Gute wasted Jordan Love's prime. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantyWrestler Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 7 hours ago, Old Guy said: The Bears have to be +2 in turnovers or Fields has to go off running the ball for us to lose. I think we are clearly the better team. Quarterback - Packers - TBD Running Backs - Packers - agree WRs - Push (Packers are still unproven) - agree TEs - Push - agree O-Line - Packers big time - agree D-line - Packers - TBD LBs - Bears slightly - TBD EDGE rushers - Packer big time - agree S - Bears - agree CB - Packers slightly - agree Specialist - Bears - agree Special Teams - Bears. - agree In theory we blow them out. Concerned about our week 1 starts in the past. Hoping our guys playing in preseason helps alleviate that issue. A couple of these are really just unknown right now. ST may be our downfall if the coverage units are not top notch. But that too is TBD yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQ1 Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 13 hours ago, Leader said: Nice that the game's getting national TV coverage. This year's gonna be a bit more hit & miss. Except where there's regional coverage...like here in the PNW. We'll be stuck with Seattle vs LA. Thank goodness for the internet stream with Larrivee and McCarren. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 17 hours ago, Old Guy said: The Bears have to be +2 in turnovers or Fields has to go off running the ball for us to lose. I think we are clearly the better team. Quarterback - Packers Running Backs - Packers WRs - Push (Packers are still unproven) TEs - Push O-Line - Packers big time D-line - Packers LBs - Bears slightly EDGE rushers - Packer big time S - Bears CB - Packers slightly Specialist - Bears Special Teams - Bears. In theory we blow them out. Concerned about our week 1 starts in the past. Hoping our guys playing in preseason helps alleviate that issue. Giving GB an advantage at QB is a stretch. At best it's an unknown. CHI definitely has an advantage at WR with Moore, Mooney and Claypool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Mazrimiv said: Giving GB an advantage at QB is a stretch. At best it's an unknown. CHI definitely has an advantage at WR with Moore, Mooney and Claypool. Would not trade our QB and WRs for theirs. For the future or this one game. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Mazrimiv said: Giving GB an advantage at QB is a stretch. At best it's an unknown. CHI definitely has an advantage at WR with Moore, Mooney and Claypool. Did you see Fields in preseason? Also, would you trade our group for their group straight up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 38 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Would not trade our QB and WRs for theirs. For the future or this one game. Would you trade pick 32 for Claypool? lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: Would not trade our QB and WRs for theirs. For the future or this one game. 1 hour ago, Old Guy said: Did you see Fields in preseason? Also, would you trade our group for their group straight up? You both have twisted what he said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.