mikebpackfan Posted September 6, 2023 Author Share Posted September 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Is it OK to freak out now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: Our WRs over DJ Moore is a poor choice. Not nearly as bad as Claypool over our WRs Now you're twisting words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zycho32 Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 Now all we need is a monsoon in Chicago and it'll be just like the twenties! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Not nearly as bad as Claypool over our WRs Now you're twisting words. Claypool is their 3rd receiver. He shouldnt be compared to our 1 or 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 3 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Claypool is their 3rd receiver. He shouldnt be compared to our 1 or 2. CorpS Plural You just compared a single member. Twisting words. CorpS is like 5-6 deep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 5 minutes ago, incognito_man said: CorpS Plural You just compared a single member. Twisting words. CorpS is like 5-6 deep Yes one whose gap over our #1 is enough to overcome smaller gaps elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 Bakh not playing week 1 given all the rest he's been given would be a huge disappointment 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Yes one whose gap over our #1 is enough to overcome smaller gaps elsewhere. Disagreed. Give me the guy caught as many TDs as a raw rookie in year two over the guy who took 5 years to match that production in year 6. Edited September 6, 2023 by incognito_man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 42 minutes ago, R T said: And that would make any difference how? He's the only one pass catcher who's not a rookie aside from Toure.. I think it speaks to how poor the situation without Doubs and Watson could be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 8 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: Bakh not playing week 1 given all the rest he's been given would be a huge disappointment He's playing. Vet rest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 9 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: He's the only one pass catcher who's not a rookie aside from Toure.. I think it speaks to how poor the situation without Doubs and Watson could be. He is a former 7th round pick that has been cut multiple times, a practice squad player who has never played in a regular season NFL game. He is not making any difference than the WR's on the 53. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 15 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: He's the only one pass catcher who's not a rookie aside from Toure.. I think it speaks to how poor the situation without Doubs and Watson could be. Most teams are not good without their top 2 WRs. Let's just keep that in mind. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Arthur Penske said: Can they activiate Melton in this scenario? Not 100% sure but they could bring players up from practice squad 3 times before having to sign them to the 53 or waiving them. I do not think it stats how many players can be brought up in an individual week. Short answer, I would think yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 14 minutes ago, R T said: He is a former 7th round pick that has been cut multiple times, a practice squad player who has never played in a regular season NFL game. He is not making any difference than the WR's on the 53. 11 minutes ago, Norm said: Most teams are not good without their top 2 WRs. Let's just keep that in mind. Yes, obviously it's not an upgrade or a good scenario. But rolling into the game with 4 active WRs and one coming off a fresh hamstring injury (Wicks) and 3/4 never playing in a NFL game is not a good plan. Melton may need to be a consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted September 6, 2023 Share Posted September 6, 2023 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Old Guy said: Not 100% sure but they could bring players up from practice squad 3 times before having to sign them to the 53 or waiving them. I do not think it stats how many players can be brought up in an individual week. Short answer, I would think yes. I believe I've read you can activate 2 from PS in a given week. Quote Teams now have more flexibility with using practice squad players on game day. PS players can be activated on game day before the team announces their inactives (90 minutes before game time). The player doesn’t have to be elevated from the PS to the main roster for the move. This can happen with up to two practice squad players per week. A player is now able to be elevated three times per season. To be activated a fourth time requires the player to be signed to the regular roster. Edited September 6, 2023 by Brat&Beer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.