Jump to content

Pack at Dallas Post Game: Four and One


mikebpackfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, incognito_man said:

No, you stated "the route wasn't right". Now you're changing your statement :)

I did as at the beginning of my statement and finished with maybe Rodgers just missed him ... O.o:D    I'm very happy as Rodgers being a game manager at this stage of his career.  Hopefully his deep throws become more on target ... and soon.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Howler said:

MVS had to wait for the ball. True.

Not a rant, but thats consistent with what AR was doing last year - when it appeared he was allowing a beaten DB "back in the catch" because a WR needed to slow down/wait on the ball and sometimes (not always) the WR had to catch the ball "thru" the DB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, coachbuns said:

Maybe a little more WR talent would help!?  Nobody was getting open.  Without Adams what the heck did you expect?  Rodgers threw to his running backs which was nice.  Graham had a few catches, Tonyan was fine until hurt.  We just need more help getting open for explosive plays to happen.

 

200 yards without a single open reciever. 

Edited by HyponGrey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I have to say about the postgame is that I feel vindicated for my safety obsession.  Seriously in today's NFL the most underrated position in football.  We gave up 0 points when he was on the field.  To a really good offense.  Second half he didn't play, we give up 24 points. 

We're really going to need him when we face a seriously underrated Lions team coming off a bye. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Outpost31 said:

All I have to say about the postgame is that I feel vindicated for my safety obsession.  Seriously in today's NFL the most underrated position in football.  We gave up 0 points when he was on the field.  To a really good offense.  Second half he didn't play, we give up 24 points. We're really going to need him when we face a seriously underrated Lions team coming off a bye. 

Dont think you were alone with....well, I wont call it an obsession, but plenty of people were targeting the S position as a necessary add. As for the game and scoring after Savage got injured.....I'm not lessening his impact (or loss) but 5min into the 3rd Qtr we led 24-zip and at 10min in led 31-3 - so I suspect our defensive scheme changed a bit....and while not outright "prevent" is was probably close.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Leader said:

Dont think you were alone with....well, I wont call it an obsession, but plenty of people were targeting the S position as a necessary add. As for the game and scoring after Savage got injured.....I'm not lessening his impact (or loss) but 5min into the 3rd Qtr we led 24-zip and at 10min in led 31-3 - so I suspect our defensive scheme changed a bit....and while not outright "prevent" is was probably close.  

Prevent with the a rangy centerfield safety who can close at tremendous speed is significantly better than prevent with Redmond WTF was that tackle attempt on Cooper on the 53 yard TD play.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...