Jump to content

2020 Divisional - 6) LA Rams @ 1) GB Packers


notthatbluestuff

2020 Divisional - LA Rams @ GB Packers  

79 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins?

    • Los Angeles Rams
      28
    • Green Bay Packers
      51

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/16/2021 at 09:35 PM

Recommended Posts

Sometimes you'll hear some fans say:

"Take away Davante Adams and they have nothing else in the passing game !"

Its been a popular meme since the draft ( GASP !) and its oft repeated.
My suggestion is: "Don't listen to those fans"

Packers have flitted around as either number 1, 2, or 3 offense all year- and if all a DC had to do was double Davante, then why did the Packers continue to win 13 games and earn the number 1 seed in the NFC ? So easy a cave man could shut them down...

" Fine, those are general production stats - how about something a little more specific, smarty pants ? "

Glad you asked. The Mighty Green Bay Packers went on a road trip to see the Saints-  in their Dome of Doom. Unfortunately, Mr. Adams was unable to participate vs this Top 5 defense, boasting Lattimore, Janoris Jenkins and Malcolm Jenkins in their talented secondary.

So...how did that work out ? Well...the poor talent-deprived Packers managed to beat the Saints in the Dome of Doom while Rodgers threw 21/32 for 283, 3 TDs, 0 INTs and a 124.9 rating despite missing his one and only  WR - Davante Adams

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202009270nor.htm

So the next time somebody tries to sell you that story, ignore them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shanedorf said:

Sometimes you'll hear some fans say:

"Take away Davante Adams and they have nothing else in the passing game !"

Its been a popular meme since the draft ( GASP !) and its oft repeated.
My suggestion is: "Don't listen to those fans"

Packers have flitted around as either number 1, 2, or 3 offense all year- and if all a DC had to do was double Davante, then why did the Packers continue to win 13 games and earn the number 1 seed in the NFC ? So easy a cave man could shut them down...

" Fine, those are general production stats - how about something a little more specific, smarty pants ? "

Glad you asked. The Mighty Green Bay Packers went on a road trip to see the Saints-  in their Dome of Doom. Unfortunately, Mr. Adams was unable to participate vs this Top 5 defense, boasting Lattimore, Janoris Jenkins and Malcolm Jenkins in their talented secondary.

So...how did that work out ? Well...the poor talent-deprived Packers managed to beat the Saints in the Dome of Doom while Rodgers threw 21/32 for 283, 3 TDs, 0 INTs and a 124.9 rating despite missing his one and only  WR - Davante Adams

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202009270nor.htm

So the next time somebody tries to sell you that story, ignore them

It is not possible to cover them all!  The only solution to this is to for the Rams to rush 11 on every play and hope they can pressure Rodgers enough to make mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Shanedorf said:

Sometimes you'll hear some fans say:

"Take away Davante Adams and they have nothing else in the passing game !"

Its been a popular meme since the draft ( GASP !) and its oft repeated.
My suggestion is: "Don't listen to those fans"

Packers have flitted around as either number 1, 2, or 3 offense all year- and if all a DC had to do was double Davante, then why did the Packers continue to win 13 games and earn the number 1 seed in the NFC ? So easy a cave man could shut them down...

" Fine, those are general production stats - how about something a little more specific, smarty pants ? "

Glad you asked. The Mighty Green Bay Packers went on a road trip to see the Saints-  in their Dome of Doom. Unfortunately, Mr. Adams was unable to participate vs this Top 5 defense, boasting Lattimore, Janoris Jenkins and Malcolm Jenkins in their talented secondary.

So...how did that work out ? Well...the poor talent-deprived Packers managed to beat the Saints in the Dome of Doom while Rodgers threw 21/32 for 283, 3 TDs, 0 INTs and a 124.9 rating despite missing his one and only  WR - Davante Adams

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202009270nor.htm

So the next time somebody tries to sell you that story, ignore them

Well Im not saying the Packers have nothing else if you take away Adams. Their "others" have to step continue to step up big time. Take for instance MVS. He make big plays but then he'll drop balls and in the Colts game he fumbled. The Saints game was impressive but what you dont mention is the Saints defense for whatever reason early in seasons always start slowly. Its the same Saints defense that the Raiders did what they wanted to do to them. So while it was impressive the Packers caught the Saints at the right time. Do you think the Packers wouldve done the same thing to the Saints Week 10 as opposed to Week 3? My guess is no. I try to tell people all the time the Saints the first 3 or 4 weeks of the season will not be all that good but then for whatever reason they get hot win like 7-8 games in a row and be the hottest team in the NFL. So again Im not taking anything away from the Packers just saying that caught the Saints at the perfect time.

 

Edited by stl4life07
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Packers are 6-0 when Davante Adams is out the last two years. They are 10-4 when he has less than 100 yards since LaFleur took over (10-2 when he has more than 100 yards). LaFleur has shown an ability to adjust. In this game I'd expect to the Packers to feature Tonyan, Jones, and Williams more. How good are the Rams defending against TEs and RBs (in the passing game)?

Edited by TheEagle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

oojrfpxj7fyywqwv6cff.jpg

       Saturday at Lambeau Field to decide who moves on to the NFC Championship.

  • This will be the 3rd postseason meeting between the two franchises, with the Rams winning, 45-17, in St. Louis in the 2001 NFC Divisional Playoff and Green Bay winning, 28-7, in Milwaukee in the 1967 Western Conference Championship.
  • Both of those teams went on to play in the Superb Owl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE DOPE ON THIS WEEK'S OPPONENT:

Packers vs. Rams:

  • Regular season, all-time: 45-46-2
  • All-time, Postseason: 1-1
  • All-time, at home vs Rams: 28-19-0
  • All-time, at home in postseason: 1-0
  • Streaks: The Packers have won five of the last six meetings between the two teams dating back to 2007
  • Last meeting, postseason: Jan. 20, 2002, Edward Jones Dome, Rams won, 45-17

    (if you're too young to remember that 45-17 pasting, it was the worst game ever-  and then it got worse)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheEagle said:

The Packers are 6-0 when Davante Adams is out the last two years. They are 10-4 when he has less than 100 yards since LaFleur took over (10-2 when he has more than 100 yards). LaFleur has shown an ability to adjust. In this game I'd expect to the Packers to feature Tonyan, Jones, and Williams more. How good are the Rams defending against TEs and RBs (in the passing game)?

We have the #1 defense. I don't want to be cocky, but we're good at defending just about everything. Our ILBs are the weak point, but Staley's scheme masks their weaknesses well. There will be opportunities to exploit. The key to beating our defense is protecting the QB. If you give Rodgers enough time, guys will find their way into soft spots in the zones. But if our pass rush is getting home, it's very hard to find open receivers, outside of checkdowns. And our guys rally extremely well to the ball to limit those throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are people still bringing up regular stats to try and convince how one team is going to beat the other? 

Regular season has very little bearing on the playoffs.  Did you guys just not watch Pittsburgh's regular season top rated defense get absolutely decimated just a couple of days ago? 

Coaches and players say it all of the time. The Playoffs are a different animal.

Edited by JAF-N72EX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...