Jump to content

NFL should remove seeding priority from division winners


pf9

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, pf9 said:

The NFL needs to realize that not every division winner is worthy of opening the playoffs at home.

Right now in both conferences there is a non-division leader that has a better record than the leader of another division in the conference.

I'm paying particular attention to Cleveland which is now 10-5 but is in second place in the AFC North while Jacksonville leads the AFC South at 8-7.

The Browns have never hosted a playoff game at their current venue, a result of the NFL not forcing Art Modell to sell the Browns in 1995 while being awarded a version of the Ravens built through an expansion draft. The last home playoff game hosted by the Browns was at the old stadium in 1994.

By removing seeding priority for division winners - something I praise the NBA for - it will make potential playoff teams fight harder to earn a particular seed.

Two interesting scenarios can come from this:

1. A division winner being so bad they are saddled with the 7th seed and thus having no chance at a home playoff game going on to win the Super Bowl.

2. The top two seeds come from the same division, potentially setting up the biggest game in the rivalry's history in the conference championship game.

Before responding consider this. Anyone who claims to be an NFL fan but does not want this is not really an NFL fan.

no-nope.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, pf9 said:

The NBA has already established that being in the playoffs alone is reward enough for winning your division (though it almost became a problem last year when one division winner, the Heat, was relegated to the play-in round, they survived and made it all the way to the NBA Finals).

Quite frankly, the NBA should have adopted their current seeding system the instant they became a 6-division league 19 years ago.

Bring the NBA into a discussion about NFL playoffs is crazy. The NBA playoffs are not single games they so each team has home games. Not to mention the playoffs in the NBA last as long as the season.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, so the NFL should change the whole setup to accommodate... the Browns?  

 

The system is fine as is.  Divisions play 14/17 common opponents each season.  As much as it sucks being in the same division as Baltimore and Pitt, it makes those home playoff games even more rewarding.

 

And when you throw in the idea that the league wants to at least explore the idea of neutral sight championship games, the OP justy makes even less sense, if that's possible.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said:

Hard disagree.  In fact, they should eliminate wild card games all together.  As is, they already are giving 6 free passes to teams that didn't even win their division.  

They should also eliminate every division winner, too. Just have a 32 team tournament to end the season - single elimination. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, VigilantZombie said:

Teams who fail to do so shouldn't be rewarded with better seeds, simply put. There's no good argument against that.

Both south divisions, but especially the NFC south have been trash for years. There is nothing special about the NFC south division leader limping to a home playoff loss with a losing record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ET80 said:

They should also eliminate every division winner, too. Just have a 32 team tournament to end the season - single elimination. 

I have an even better idea.  It involves a LOT of strategy.  The team that finishes with the best record, but doesn't win their division wins the championship.  So like, do you go on a tear at the beginning of the season then pepper in a couple of losses?  Do you only play hard in odd numbered weeks? Do you start 0-6 and then man all stations for a tough run?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...