bigbadbuff Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 6 hours ago, RaidersAreOne said: Typically i think of the Bills as a very young team but they are top five oldest.... Gore and Lorenzo Alexander definitely helping move the needle lol!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buno67 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Steelersfan43 said: Being too young (like the Browns in 2017 or the Rams under Jeff Fisher) is normally not a good thing..I do not think many players of the Browns in 2017 are still in their roster this year, even if this team had the most younger roster in the NFL just 2 years ago. Yeah they don’t have a lot of players from that ‘17 squad. Dorsey flipper like close to 50% his first full year and he did more this year. Biggest issue was that ‘17 squad was following some older squads. The ‘15 season they were the 24th youngest team. They had a lot of vets but still sucked. So when Sashi came in that was his biggest goal was get young and bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 17 hours ago, Steelersfan43 said: I do not know if the Bears players, coach and fan will be confident if the Bears need a clutch FG of Eddy Pineiro to win a game... It was in the last preseason.. It was absolutely a shank. He also made the next 3 kicks. He ended the preseason missing 1 48 yard FG, and 1 xp, also made a 58 yard FG. He went 12-14 (85%) in the preseason on total kicks. Anyone still trying to make this a story is just trying to make a story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelersfan43 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 34 minutes ago, FinSting said: I believe Flores, he is a rather intense man and I wouldn't want to be a player that gets on his bad side. It amuses me when a losing team dumps the players that led them to losing records, and the media consensus is to somehow think the losing team will be losers. Like um, those guys were already losing. That's the guys you WANT gone. Now they got young hungry (broke af) guys out to prove themselves and make that money. Coach'em up with X's and O's stuff and let's see what happens on Sundays. I agree Even if a team is rebuilding like the Dolphins this year, I do not think players and coaches want to be remembered when an all-time bad team ... If you have pride, you never want to lose,no matter what. I remember 2 years ago, many thought the Jets was going to tank for a draft pick, but they played hard almost every week and they were competitive for much of the season, despite their lack of talent, so even if the GM make move for the future, it does not always mean that you want the team to play for the first overall pick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceinthehouse Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 The Redskins don't have a WR currently on the Roster with a jersey # in the 80's. I don't know if I've ever seen that from any team, ever. Here are our current WR's & their #'s. Richardson 10 Harmon 13 Quinn 14 Sims Jr. 15 McLaurin 17 Davis 19 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ_11 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 24 minutes ago, aceinthehouse said: The Redskins don't have a WR currently on the Roster with a jersey # in the 80's. I don't know if I've ever seen that from any team, ever. Here are our current WR's & their #'s. Richardson 10 Harmon 13 Quinn 14 Sims Jr. 15 McLaurin 17 Davis 19 It's gotten to the point now when if I see a rookie WR take a # in the 80s, it surprises me. 10-19 has become so much more popular on WRs over the course of the last few years it seems. I kind of like it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 29 minutes ago, aceinthehouse said: The Redskins don't have a WR currently on the Roster with a jersey # in the 80's. I don't know if I've ever seen that from any team, ever. Here are our current WR's & their #'s. Richardson 10 Harmon 13 Quinn 14 Sims Jr. 15 McLaurin 17 Davis 19 Gordon - 10 Edelman - 11 Harry - 15 Meyers - 16 Dorsett - 13 We're right there with ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iknowcool Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 (edited) 33 minutes ago, aceinthehouse said: The Redskins don't have a WR currently on the Roster with a jersey # in the 80's. I don't know if I've ever seen that from any team, ever. Here are our current WR's & their #'s. Richardson 10 Harmon 13 Quinn 14 Sims Jr. 15 McLaurin 17 Davis 19 Every WR's # on the Panthers is in the 10s too (#10-#15 exactly actually) It feels like most WRs don't ever pick a number in the 80s anymore. Edited September 2, 2019 by iknowcool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelersfan43 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 (edited) 46 minutes ago, aceinthehouse said: The Redskins don't have a WR currently on the Roster with a jersey # in the 80's. I don't know if I've ever seen that from any team, ever. Here are our current WR's & their #'s. Richardson 10 Harmon 13 Quinn 14 Sims Jr. 15 McLaurin 17 Davis 19 Same thing for the Steelers. Diontae Johnson 18 WR 5-10 183 23 R Toledo Donte Moncrief 11 WR 6-2 216 26 6 Mississippi JuJu Smith-Schuster 19 WR 6-1 215 22 3 USC Ryan Switzer 10 WR 5-8 185 24 3 North Carolina James Washington 13 WR 5-11 213 23 2 Oklahoma State Edited September 2, 2019 by Steelersfan43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGold Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Chiefs are the same; Hill - 10 Watkins - 14 Robinson - 11 Hardman - 17 Pringle - 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Ha, so ....are there any 80s now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trentwannabe Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Bills are the same: Cole Bealsey 10 Zay Jones 11 John Brown 15 Robert Foster 16 Andre Roberts 18 Isiah McKenzie 19 Though Duke Williams on the PS is 82 and he will be a little better known by seasons end I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Trentwannabe said: Though Duke Williams on the PS is 82 and he will be a little better known by seasons end I think. Was hoping he would make it with you guys, but the PS is a good start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelersfan43 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 65. Is that arbitrary? Has a team scored 64 or something? If the Chiefs didn't do it last season, I wouldn't expect them to do it this season tbh. Whilst they COULD, they are now known, with more film, without one of those weapons from last season, and I'm sure I heard their schedule is a bit tougher. So, nah, not for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts