Shady Slim Posted May 29, 2020 Author Share Posted May 29, 2020 tribe 2twins1tribe @swoosh @The Orca @Pickle Rick @Whicker @Malfatron @MookieMonstah @daboyle250 @Outpost31 @gopherwrestler @TLO @FinneasGage @mission27 @Nazgul tribe death to swooshy @Matts4313 @TedLavie @Wyld Stallyns @theuntouchable @JoshstraDaymus @Ragnarok @bcb1213 @MWil23 @ET80 @bigbadbuff @SwAg the verdict of 2T1T was that the claim succeeded. the verdict of D2S was that it didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, Malfatron said: all that matters is your last one I know. And I hated being the deciding vote and going against my initial thoughts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Slim Posted May 29, 2020 Author Share Posted May 29, 2020 i'll put it in the words of Gummow, Heydon, and Crennan, JJ. Expressions like “intoxication”, “inebriation” and “drunkenness” are difficult both to define and to apply. The fact that legislation compels publicans not to serve customers who are apparently drunk does not make the introduction of a civil duty of care defined by reference to those expressions any more workable or attractive. It is difficult for an observer to assess whether a drinker has reached the point denoted by those expressions. Some people do so faster than others. Some show the signs of intoxication earlier than others. In some the signs of intoxication are not readily apparent. With some there is the risk of confusing excitement, liveliness and high spirits with inebriation. With others, silence conceals an almost complete incapacity to speak or move. The point at which a drinker is at risk of injury from drinking can be reached in many individuals before those signs are evident. Persons serving drinks, even if they undertake the difficult process of counting the drinks served, have no means of knowing how much the drinker ingested before arrival. Constant surveillance of drinkers is impractical. Asking how much a drinker has drunk, how much of any particular bottle or round of drinks the purchaser intends to drink personally and how much will be consumed by friends of the purchaser who may be much more or much less intoxicated than the purchaser would be seen as impertinent. Equally, to ask how the drinker feels, and what the drinker’s mental and physical capacity is, would tend to destroy peaceful relations, and would collide with the interests of drinkers in their personal privacy.58 In addition, while the relatively accurate calculation of blood alcohol levels is possible by the use of breathalysers, the compulsory administration of that type of testing by police officers on the roads was bitterly opposed when legislation introduced it, and it is unthinkable that the common law of negligence could compel or sanction the use of methods so alien to community mores in hotels and restaurants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, Pickle Rick said: I know. And I hated being the deciding vote and going against my initial thoughts Then again the late voters also pushed it to the other side without my vote so....I'll take the glory but give them the blame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Slim Posted May 29, 2020 Author Share Posted May 29, 2020 the claim was not successful. THE WINNER IS D2S 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mission27 Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Wow what a joke. I'm opening a bar in Australia. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, Shady Slim said: the claim was not successful. THE WINNER IS D2S Unlike you scrubs - we were unanimous. Suck it Swoosh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 I stood with my client until the end. He would be proud, goodbye Greg 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daboyle Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Shady Slim said: the claim was not successful. THE WINNER IS D2S wow what a shocker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Shady Slim said: the claim was not successful. THE WINNER IS D2S Let’s goooooo!!!!! @Ragnarok IS THE PEOPLE’S CHAMP!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Shady Slim said: the claim was not successful. THE WINNER IS D2S ****. Should have never over thought it lmao At least Greg can disappear forever now!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Our team argued that it would have failed because keeping the keys would be theft. Bad argument was bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, The Orca said: I stood with my client until the end. He would be proud, goodbye Greg Friends don't let clients drive drunk terrible representation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, bcb1213 said: Friends don't let clients drive drunk terrible representation I got more money this way. It is what he would have wanted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: Unlike you scrubs - we were unanimous. Suck it Swoosh. I mean, we still have everyone we started with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.