squire12 Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 4 minutes ago, NYRaider said: I misread it, your offer was bigger. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 19 minutes ago, ny92mike said: Sorry 30% is there a reason the first dozen or so guys don't go anywhere? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 Thoughts on the APY value changes for this next round. I think I fixed the bulk of the issues, but I thought that a few weeks ago too. So please give that new listing a look over in the FA workbook sheet15. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 2 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: is there a reason the first dozen or so guys don't go anywhere? Their grades are still within the same range is what it looks like to me. Big differences will come in the grade ranges 70 to 50 range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 The main change is that the grades decrease faster the farther down the list you go per position. That was the issue with the current set up. This change fixes that. There will still be some players graded too high or low. Can't do anything about that at the moment. This is really just to bring the mid level players cap hits down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 Just now, ny92mike said: The main change is that the grades decrease faster the farther down the list you go per position. That was the issue with the current set up. This change fixes that. There will still be some players graded too high or low. Can't do anything about that at the moment. This is really just to bring the mid level players cap hits down. i think if you can do it for d line, that would be good. I don't think the rest of the posttions are too far out of whack. Just my opinion though 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 1 minute ago, bcb1213 said: i think if you can do it for d line, that would be good. I don't think the rest of the posttions are too far out of whack. Just my opinion though Right obviously the IDL was too high across the board, but when looking at the data the entire defense was not right. Figured I'd just fix it all at once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 Pushing this update out after this round I don't think it's giving anyone a leg up. Unless I'm missing something. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 I'm also looking at changing the contract lengths with this update. Just looking to do something simple just to get us through the mock. If it's showing 2 years bump it up to 3, etc. So with the decrease happening it should keep at least 2 years on most of the players after this next decrease. Will double check that is happening of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 1 minute ago, bcb1213 said: i think if you can do it for d line, that would be good. I don't think the rest of the posttions are too far out of whack. Just my opinion though Yeah, the DL is where it's the wackiest. I expected to sign Mario Edwards for a little more than the vet minimum, and his APY is 12.9 mil. I was just gonna wait, but if it's an easy problem to fix, that seems to be the only position where it's nuts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 5 minutes ago, ny92mike said: Pushing this update out after this round I don't think it's giving anyone a leg up. Unless I'm missing something. it does somewhat impact any team that acquired a higher priced defender in the first few rounds that were needing a higher APY to acquire them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 3 minutes ago, squire12 said: it does somewhat impact any team that acquired a higher priced defender in the first few rounds that were needing a higher APY to acquire them. I get that but that was on them to bid that amount. I know when I was looking to find a IDL I passed because the values were out of my range. I figured this update would make everyone happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 Just now, ny92mike said: I get that but that was on them to bid that amount. I know when I was looking to find a IDL I passed because the values were out of my range. I figured this update would make everyone happy. This adjustment doesn't really affect the high graded players it just brings all the mid to low level players into a more realistic apy range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 Be advised when this current FA bidding round is completed. I'm going to be making some changes to the APY values for defensive players to bring them more inline with realistic APY values. Expect the mid to low level talent to see a significant decrease in APY values. You can view these future changes in the Free Agent workbook sheet15. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15eLbOcSk4Z_rnKfOInr5jsXBYQ1KnjlrVtxld1or5WQ/edit#gid=1322619522 Just wanted to make you guys aware of these changes should it change your game planning for this round of bidding. Team GM Tags Arizona Cardinals - @LuckyNumber11 Atlanta Falcons - @ovfd55 Baltimore Ravens - @Justone2 Buffalo Bills -@downundermikeCarolina Panthers - @MikeT14 Chicago Bears - @squire12 Cincinnati Bengals - @sparky151 Cleveland Browns - @cortes02 Dallas Cowboys - @JetsandI Denver Broncos - @BowserBroncos Detroit Lions - @winitall Green Bay Packers - @GhostnoteHouston Texans - @jch1911 Indianapolis Colts - @RTTRUTH Jacksonville Jaguars - @Trojan Kansas City Chiefs - @RedGold Las Vegas Raiders - @NYRaider & @Humble_Beast Los Angeles Chargers - @whodatOL Los Angeles Rams - @Freebirdsrams Miami Dolphins - @mountainpd Minnesota Vikings - @KingOfNewYork New England Patriots - @Deadpulse New Orleans Saints - @whodatOL New York Giants - @YogiBiz New York Jets - @bcb1213 Philadelphia Eagles - @EaglesPeteC Pittsburgh Steelers - @Cbrunn San Francisco 49ers - @Forge Seattle Seahawks - @DTMW78 Tampa Bay Buccaneers - @BucsDraftGeek47 Tennessee Titans - @Daniel & @SerenityNow Washington Commanders - @MKnight82 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 Pretty quiet around here today, what gives? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.fa0116d98c71030fe0d7e58edaa8454e.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.